Thursday , March 28 2024
Home / The News Today / Museveni defends Age Limit amendment

Museveni defends Age Limit amendment

Ugandan Opposition MP Allan Ssewanyana (C) holds a chair as he stands on a table after unseen Speaker Rebecca Kadaga asked him and another 24 lawmakers to leave during the plenary session at The Ugandan Parliament in Kampala on September 27, 2017.

Opposition threats

Commenting on the MPs’ concerns about hostility of the opposition exhibited during the course of the debate, including violent behaviour, President Museveni said it was because the opposition had nothing constructive to offer.

“The intolerance is because the opposition are ideologically bankrupt and have nothing to offer. They are desperate because the Movement has revamped the economy and generated revenue and we are able to deliver to the population. They now think that the only way to get rid of the Movement is to do away with particular players,” he noted.

The President also dismissed claims that incumbency gives him an edge over his opponents, saying it instead placed a bigger burden on the candidate as the voters’ expectations are higher.

“Incumbency in a way is a disadvantage. You get blamed all the time,” he said, adding that where incumbents have been unpopular like it was with Kenneth Kaunda in Zambia, Kamuzu Banda in Malawi and several other cases, they have lost elections.

Fitness, health, term limits

On media reports attributed to him about the performance of leaders above the age of 75, President Museveni said politics is about ideology and service and not sport where one needed to compete physically.

“Politics is not Olympics or rugby where you need to compete physically. The presidency is a guiding role,” he said.

On whether the country should remove age limit and reinstate term limits, the President said at this stage of development, limits were not the most important issue for Uganda because the country has more pressing concerns.

“It took America more than a century and half while developing their economy and political class to put presidential term limits in their constitution. When they finally did so in 1947, everything they wanted had happened. They had developed, the colonies had integrated,” he said. “But here; what has happened? In Africa you behave like we are running countries and yet we are creating countries.”

After taking the MPs through an elaborate history of the American War of Independence, formation of Modern Day America, collapse of Capitalism in 1929 through the Great Depression and the final introduction of presidential term limits in 1947, President Museveni warned Africans against aping everything from the West while ignoring their local conditions and realities.

Seven-year term?

On the proposal to increase the years of term of office from five to seven years the President said the leaders in Africa have much more to do and need adequate time to develop the continent and saw no harm in having longer terms.

“For these countries with all these problems, two terms of five years is just a joke. Those who talk about this are just looking at improving their CVs. We might not discuss it now but there is merit at looking at the seven years. It would give some time to these young countries to develop. France has seven-year terms, I do not see what they have lost,” said the President.

The President also dismissed the notion that the amendment was tailored to benefit him, pointing out that removal of the 35-year minimum for presidential candidates would instead give room to more young people who had been locked out to have a chance to run for the presidency.

According to the State House statement, the MPs, through Robinah Rwakoojo, the committee’s deputy chairperson, thanked President Museveni for according them audience, and indicated they would do a good job writing a report that captures all views picked from those they interfaced with.

2 comments

  1. This is wrong: France reduced their presidential term from seven to five years about 17 years ago. Now he wants to take Uganda back towards the discarded French term. Uganda can and could be doing better but for the poor governance and corrupt NRM administration. He wants to be lauded for his sub-optimal performance. Obviously Uganda can do better minus corruption and bad governance. Corruption is self-serving in that it is good for the current regime because it entrenches it in power for a long, long time. Corruption engenders inequality — those on top will remain on top forever with it’s attendant economic inefficiencies. And corruption ensures no mobility that gives opportunities for those at lower ranks to rise: progress. It is not an accident that power in America never stayed with America’s founding fathers or their off springs forever. It was by design and it explains it’s economic dynamism and robustness.

  2. I dont think in African politics we have reached that level our democracy must be given chance to grow .
    Two terms seems to be good so we could see how we develop , it is not only in uganda but in many other countries africa and beyond .
    Age we know that when we grow old we become more venerable to manipulation from those around us who tend to use our names for their own gain , the good examples can be jomo kenyata of kenya and now the old Robert mugabe . I do feel those who are senior citizens need to go and rest in peace.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *