Thursday , April 25 2024
Home / NEWS / New cyber law spells out tough penalties for offenders

New cyber law spells out tough penalties for offenders

The Computer Misuse Bill moved by Nsereko imposes tough penalties for cyber-crimes.

Kampala, Uganda | THE INDEPENDENT | Parliament has passed the Computer Misuse (Amendment) Bill, 2022 privately moved by Muhammad Nsereko, Kampala Central MP, which imposes tough penalties for cyber-crimes.

The Computer Misuse (Amendment) Bill, 2022 sought to amend the Computer Misuse Act, 2011 to enhance the provisions on unauthorised access to information or data; prohibit the sharing of any information relating to a child without authorisation from a parent or guardian; to prohibit the sending or sharing of information that promotes hate speech.

With deletion of clauses that sought to bar convicts under the law from holding public office or running for elections in 10 years, the rest of the clauses unanimously sailed through uncontested, with MP Gorreth Namugga of Mawogola County South dissenting.

A new clause in the bill, proposed by the ICT committee chairperson, Moses Magogo, defined social media and created penalties for computer users who take refuge in pseudo accounts.

The clause reads: “A person who uses social media to publish, distribute or share information, prohibited under the laws of Uganda or using disguised or false identity, commits an offence”.

A person who manages an account of an organisation where this happens will be held liable for the commission of the offence, the bill provides.

The clause proceeded to give a diverse definition of social media to mean, “a set of technologies, sites, and practices which are used to share opinions, experiences and perspectives, and includes YouTube, WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, WeChat, TikTok, Sina Weibo, QQ, Telegram, Snapchat, Kuaishou, Qzone, Reddit, Quora, Skype, Microsoft Team and Linkedin”.

A person who commits the offence under the clause in issue shall, on conviction, suffer either a fine of Shs16 million, five years in jail or both fine and imprisonment.

Social media accounts that are verified will be presumed to be owned by the persons in whose names the accounts are run, unless the contrary is proved.

Also, a person whose telephone numbers and or email addresses have been used in creating social media, will be personally liable for prosecution for offences committed under the act as amended.

Magogo justified the clause as being intended to “provide for the regulation of social media”.

The bill also criminalised and defined unsolicited information, but excused commercial adverts from the categorisation, granting advertisers the liberty to share information with target audiences.

“For the purposes of this section, “unsolicited information” means information transmitted to a person using the internet without the person’s consent, but does not include an unsolicited commercial communication,” partly reads clause 5.

In her minority report, MP Namugga said the bill was unconstitutional and implored the House not to pass it.

“The entire bill should not be left to stand as part of our laws as all the clauses are already catered for in existing legislation and in some instances offends the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda; the fundamental rights to access information electronically and to express oneself over computer networks are utterly risked by this bill,” she said.

She added: “lf passed into law, it will stifle the acquisition of information; the penalties proposed in the bill are overly harsh and disproportionate when compared to similar offences in other legislations; this bill if passed, will be a bad law and liable to constitutional petitions upon assent.”

MP Dan Atwijukire of Kazo County processed the bill on behalf of its mover, Nsereko.

*****

SOURCE: UGANDA PARLIAMENT MEDIA

5 comments

  1. Several cases of child abuse have got captured through wide dissemination using the very method of communication that is being considered criminal
    Sorry

  2. This is basically an anti-whistleblower and anti-tip off bill.

    • When an incident happens in the community, the would be witnesses fear consequences that arise from release of their respective identity.

      One would reveal a crime without giving away personal detail with hope that the concerned can investigate it further.

      Else where individuals withdraw from a competition if the runmates are of questionable intergrity, here we seem to assimilate the trait.

      The Pearl

      • It seems MPs want to eat… actually, to feast… in peace… without any anonymous tip offs or anonymous whistleblowers interfering. Ugandans will no longer be able to legally expose corruption, underhand dealings or wrongdoing without compromising their safety.

        Responsible citizens are being made to fail in their duty to bring to light incriminating information or evidence using anonymity to protect their identity.

        It’s a pro-corruption bill.

        What a shame.

  3. I have been publically offended on social media ,, and I would need some help please ,,,am being mentally tortured because of the duke of Makerere tweet on his Twitter account please help me because am now at the verge of dropping out of school due to the public chaos on my image that’s going viral on social media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *