Sunday , September 22 2019
Home / In The Magazine / Homosexuality not Genetic, says study

Homosexuality not Genetic, says study

Lokodo pleased, LGBTs say study misunderstood

Kampala, Uganda | PATRICIA AKANKWATSA | Uganda’s Minister for Ethics and Integrity Fr. Simon Lokodo has welcomed results of a recent massive study that shows that the so-called ‘gay gene’ is a total myth.

“Of course there is no person born gay,” said Lokodo who has been in the lead in the crusade against homosexuality in Uganda.

Lokodo added: “Since it has been proven by scientists, we are going to persecute every one of them who is pretending to be normal”.

Uganda has been in the spotlight on gay rights since President Yoweri Museveni in February 2014 signed into law a bill toughening penalties for gay people following tough debate and threats of economic sanction from America and the West. The law Museveni signed criminalises acts of homosexuality with sentences of s life imprisonment for acts of “aggravated homosexuality”. It also criminalises the “promotion “of homosexuality” by LGBTQ activists.

One of the central points of contention was whether some people are genetically predisposed to be gay or homosexuality is lifestyle choice. Most of those in favour of gay persecution favoured the view that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice while those opposed said it was genetic.

The search for the precise genetic basis for sexual orientation was the motivation for the study whose results were published in the journal `Science’ on Aug.31. The study was done by an international group of scientists working with 23andMe, a personal genomics firm.

Instead of finding the single gene responsible for homosexuality, the study says all human sexual orientation appears to be influenced by a complex mix of genetic and environmental influences. That’s also the case for many other human traits, such as height.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” study co-author Ben Neale, a statistical geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, told Live Science.

Richard Lusimba of Sexual Minorities Uganda says the research is going to be misconceived because everyone is now jumping to conclusions.

“This research focused on one side and if you look at things, there is no specific gene for being straight either. People who have always argued from this angle are the ones making conclusions but there is no conclusive degree to all this,”Lusimba says.

The belief that there is a “gay gene” was born around 1993 when studies by American geneticist, author, and filmmaker Dean Hamer and others indicated a link between the Xq28 marker and male sexual orientation.

The latest study says, however, there is no individual gene alone that makes a person gay, lesbian or bisexual; instead, thousands of genes likely influence sexual orientation

The study used what is called a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 408,995 individuals in the UK Biobank, a British health resource, and 68,527 American 23andMe users—all of whom remained anonymous and consented to the study.

A GWAS involves scanning a person’s DNA for tiny variations in the genetic code that correlate with a given trait. The participants were divided on the basis of whether they answered yes or no to the question “Have you ever had sex with someone of the same sex?”

Across human societies and in both sexes, between 2% and 10% of people report engaging in sex with a member of the same sex, either exclusively or in addition to sex with a member of the opposite sex, the researchers said.

The biological factors that contribute to sexual orientation are largely unknown, but many scientists suspect that genetics plays a role, given that same-sex sexual behavior appears to run in families and is seen more often in identical twins than in fraternal twins.

But a precise genetic basis for sexual orientation has been elusive, largely because scientists previously had relatively small groups of volunteers to investigate.

“Because it is a controversial topic, funding has historically been limited and recruitment of participants was difficult,” study co-author FahSathirapongsasuti, a senior scientist and computational biologist at the genetic testing company 23andMe, told Live Science. Same-sex orientation remains criminalised in more than 70 countries, some with the death penalty, often stifling those willing to disclose such personal information.

The new study, however, included a much larger number of participants, making the results more statistically reliable than those of the previous, smaller studies.

In the largest genetic study of sexual orientation to date, scientists studied a group of about 470,000 volunteers in the United Kingdom and the United States who reported on whether they had ever engaged in same-sex sexual behavior.

They relied on genetic data from the UK Biobank (a long-term health and genetics study running in the United Kingdom) and 23andMe, as well as responses to surveys asking questions about sexual identity, attraction, fantasies and behavior.

“To give you a sense of the scale of the data, this is approximately 100-times-fold bigger than previous studies on this topic,” study lead author Andrea Ganna, a researcher at the Institute for Molecular Medicine in Finland, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, told Live Science.

The researchers could not find any one gene linked with same-sex sexual behavior. Five genetic variants did appear significantly linked to sexual orientation, and thousands more also seemed involved to a lesser extent.

In the end, the scientists could not find any genetic patterns that could be used, in any way, to identify a person’s sexual orientation. Instead, the predisposition to same-sex sexual behavior appeared influenced by a complex mix of genetic and environmental influences. That’s also the case for many other human traits, such as height.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” study co-author Ben Neale, a statistical geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, told Live Science.

However, the finding that there’s no single gay gene does not mean that sexual orientation is not genetic or biological, and is therefore a lifestyle choice.

“This is wrong,” study co-author Brendan Zietsch, a geneticist at the University of Queensland in Australia, told Live Science. “We find that there are many, many genes that predispose one to same-sex sexual behavior. Each of them individually has a very small effect, but together they have a substantial effect.

“Another possible misinterpretation is to think that if same-sex preference is genetically influenced, it must therefore be totally genetically determined,” Zietsch added. “That is not true. Genetically identical individuals — twins — often have different sexual orientations. We know there are non-genetic influences as well, but we don’t understand these well, and our study does not say anything about them.”

However, some of the genetic variants identified in the massive study “could hint at some biological pathways that may be involved in same-sex sexual behavior,” Ganna said. “So one variant, for instance, was located in a stretch of DNA that houses several genes related to the sense of smell. So, we know that smell has a strong tie to sexual attraction, but its links to sexual behaviors are not clear.”

In addition, genes seemed to have greater influence on same-sex sexual behavior in men than in women, Ganna said.

The researchers suggested that genes may play a different role in same-sex behavior in males versus females because of biological factors, such as levels of testosterone and estrogen. Other factors, such as gendered social norms regarding the number of sexual partners females should have, could make women less comfortable accurately reporting their sexual behavior. That, in turn, could skew the results.

Despite the study’s large sample size, the findings are still limited because the researchers analysed only populations with European ancestry from Western, high-income countries. The data also came primarily from older individuals, who mostly lived under stricter social norms and legislative regulations than today’s. It’s possible that younger people, who often grew up under a more permissive society, might feel more free to engage in more same-sex sexual behavior than older individuals with similar genetic makeups. So the findings might not be as applicable across the age spectrum, the authors noted.

The scientists detailed their findings in the Aug. 30 issue of the journal Science. They also created a website to communicate the results of their study.

****

Source: livescience

Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *