Thursday , March 30 2023
Home / WORLD / Debate organizers: There were ‘issues’ with Trump’s microphone

Debate organizers: There were ‘issues’ with Trump’s microphone

HEMPSTEAD, NY - SEPTEMBER 26: Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump (L) speaks as Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Moderator Lester Holt listen during the Presidential Debate at Hofstra University on September 26, 2016 in Hempstead, New York. The first of four debates for the 2016 Election, three Presidential and one Vice Presidential, is moderated by NBC's Lester Holt.   Drew Angerer/Getty Images/AFP

Washington, United States | AFP | 

When Donald Trump complained about his microphone after his televised presidential debate Monday with Hillary Clinton, few people believed him — viewers had no trouble understanding his words.

But on Friday, the well-respected Commission on Presidential Debates said that in fact, the Republican candidate was right.

“Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump’s audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall,” the commission said on its website, without elaborating.

In that terse phrase the independent group thus confirmed that Trump was right in denouncing the quality of his microphone, even if his initial complaint was met with widespread derision and disbelief.

“They gave me a defective mic. Did you notice that?” he asked reporters after the debate, which was viewed by a record-breaking 84 million people in the US alone.

“My mic was defective within the room. I wonder, was that on purpose? Was that on purpose?”

Hillary Clinton, enjoying the moment after a debate in which Trump seemed to struggle as the evening wore on, quipped that “anyone complaining about microphones is not having a good night.”

It was not clear how much difference the technical problems might actually have made. Trump’s words were at all times audible on the several networks that carried the debate, though at times there seemed to be a slight echo.

That might, however, have been distracting for the candidate, particularly one who seems to thrive on audience reactions.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *