Sunday , July 12 2020
Home / Society catergory / Health / Why is it so difficult for scientists to discover new drugs?
Covid-19 Image

Why is it so difficult for scientists to discover new drugs?

No new discoveries

Of course, with complexity and uncertainty comes cost.

This is where the broken economy comes into play.

Antibiotics are not only complex to develop, the most innovative new products also cannot be sold freely.

Instead, they must be put on the shelf in reserve for serious cases – as is the case with colistin, the “drug of last resort”.

This doesn’t present an appealing investment opportunity, and over the past 30 years pharmaceutical companies have significantly decreased their work developing new antibacterial therapies.

No new classes of antibiotics have been invented for decades.

In fact, all the antibiotics brought to the market in the past 30 years have been variations on existing drugs discovered by 1984.

Most worryingly, it was as long ago as 1962 that the last new class of antibiotics to treat those infected by the most resistant gram-negative superbugs was discovered.

These include multi drug-resistant bacteria which can cause severe and often deadly bloodstream infections and pneumonia.

They pose a particular threat in hospitals, nursing homes and for patients treated with devices such as ventilators and catheters.

Other priorities include increasingly drug-resistant bacteria that cause more common diseases such as gonorrhoea and food poisoning caused by salmonella.

In recent years, as awareness of drug-resistant infections has increased and politicians have taken heed of the warnings long given by doctors and scientists, the public and private sectors have begun to work together to find solutions.

As of May 2017, a total of 51 antibiotics were in the clinical pipeline – around a third targeting priority pathogens, 12 families of bacteria seen as posing the greatest threat to human health.

But only a small number are innovative products – those not based on existing classes of antibiotics.

Not just luck

New drugs are vital but they are only part of the solution.

We also need to explore the potential for vaccines to protect against infection in the first place.

And better, more accurate diagnosis of infections could help doctors know as quickly as possible the best and most appropriate treatments.

We also need a better understanding of where drug-resistant infections are spreading, not just in people, but also in animals and the environment.

Improving hygiene in hospitals, clinics and communities across the world would help stop infection taking hold in the first place.

If we are to succeed in getting and staying ahead of superbugs we cannot rely on Fleming’s luck in 1928.

More needs to be done to ensure industry and governments work together to test promising treatments and bring them to market.

Perhaps most importantly of all, we must give this miraculous and marvellous medicine the respect it deserves.

Antibiotics, old and new, are a valuable resource, to be used only when necessary for protecting and improving health.

About this piece

This analysis piece was commissioned by the BBC from an expert working for an outside organisation.

The overuse of antibiotics

• A fifth of antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary, Public Health England says

• Coughs or bronchitis may take three weeks to clear on their own, but antibiotics reduce that by just one to two days, it says

• Thousands of people die each year as a result of drug-resistant infections

• Worldwide, if unaddressed, drug-resistant infections could kill more people than cancer by 2050

• Animals consume a large proportion of antibiotics – as much as 80% in the US

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *