Wednesday , September 22 2021
Home / COLUMNISTS / Andrew Mwenda / Ethiopia’s failed reform

Ethiopia’s failed reform

How Africa’s most successful economy has produced a political crisis that may tear it apart

THE LAST WORD | ANDREW M. MWENDA | It is eight months now since the armed conflict between the Ethiopian government and the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), began. Initially, government troops, supported by Eritrean troops, seemed successful; capturing the Tigrayan capital of Makelle in late November. The government issued a statement declaring that what was remaining were mop-up operations. Four weeks ago, TPLF retook Makelle. Ethiopia may be settling into what may become an intractable civil war.

But Tigray is not the only hot stop in Ethiopia’s likely descent into chaos and anarchy. Oromia, the most populous region of Ethiopia and home of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, is restless. The Ogaden region that borders Somalia has had a long running mini civil war. And now the Amahra region, allied to the central government, has sent its own militia to fight against the Tigray. If the situation is not handled with considerable political and diplomatic skill, we may see Ethiopia on the road to Somalia.

Two things about this conflict are intriguing. First, since the TPLF captured power in 1991 (30 years this year), Ethiopia has been the most dynamic and successful economy in Africa. In terms of GPD growth, it has been the second fastest growing economy in Africa, behind Equatorial Guinea, and fifth in the world behind China, Qatar and Cambodia. It is one of the few countries in Africa where manufacturing as a share of GDP has been increasing, thereby showing potential to attract excess labour out of agriculture in rural areas to industry in urban centers.

Yet by 2018, Ethiopia was beset by widespread protests that led to the collapse of the government of Prime Minister Haile Mariam. Why did Africa’s most successful economy also become one that manufactured intense public discontent?

The high priests of African politics had a ready answer: Ethiopia was being ruled by authoritarian “regime” that stifled freedom, jailed political opponents and journalists. Because it was not subject to “checks and balances”, “regime” insiders indulged corruption and human rights abuses, “looting” public resources and torturing prisoners.

The solution, according to the priesthood, was obvious and as is always the case with Africa, it is picked from a textbook – democracy. So, in comes the new and young prime minister in his late 30s, Abiy Ahmed.

Drinking from the rich well of theory, filled with boundless optimism, hope and new energy, he launched a series of reforms based on the gospel preached by the priesthood. He released political prisoners and journalists, allowed opposition politicians to operate, invited political exiles to return home, liberalised the media and allowed free debate and expression etc.

Ethiopia was on the road to become a Jeffersonian democracy, never mind that Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the USA, ruled a country where only a tiny number of propertied white men could vote. Meanwhile Native Americans were being exterminated, African Americans were still enslaved, women and poor white men had no vote. But who cares, there was freedom of the press, freedom of political organisation, an independent judiciary and an equally independent parliament.

Abiy did more than that. He reached out to Ethiopia’s long-standing enemy, Eritrea and made peace with it. Where former prime minister Meles Zenawi had facilitated political parties and a federal system based on ethnic identity, Abiy launched a nationalist party and invited all other ethnic parties to join. To clean the past, Abiy also fired and/or jailed many former leaders of Ethiopia who had been accused of corruption and human rights abuses. Not surprisingly they were largely from TPLF which had dominated power. On the basis of these reforms, Abiy was hailed as a reformer and a moderniaer. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2019.

So what has gone wrong in a country where economic success had now been linked to internationally acclaimed political reform to create the textbook case of good governance and prudent leadership? Of course, the priesthood will not look at how wrong (or unfitting to the Ethiopian context) their solutions are. Right now, they are trying to pinpoint the cause of Ethiopia’s problem. They will say Abiy’s solutions were right but he implemented them badly. They will claim he was not thoroughgoing enough and find other faults to blame him.

I do not want to claim any expertise on Ethiopia. In fact, I am running the risk of doing exactly what I am accusing the priesthood of doing – giving a standard textbook explanation combined with one-size-fits-all solution. But let me hazard an explanation and an answer. The crisis of Ethiopia is primarily political. However, I think economic factors have provided the spark.

First, rapidly growing economies tend to produce new social forces – a more educated, exposed and therefore aspirational young people. These expect and demand more. However, opportunities are never enough to meet these expectations. The mismatch between these expectations and available opportunities leads to social frustrations hence a tendency towards political protest.

Therefore, the protests that engulfed Ethiopia from 2014 to 2018 were expected given its rapid economic change. The challenge was how to handle them. The most suitable answer to protest is never to give in, because that only incentivises protesters to demand more. The most effective and appropriate response is repression. Once a government has gained full control, it should pursue reform in slow and measured ways under its own terms. Ethiopia seemed to have done this. So where did it error?

Although repression had succeeded, Abiy failed to handle the problem of TPLF tactfully. The TPLF had run Ethiopia for 25 years. During this period, it dominated the economy and the military. To consolidate power, he needed to curb this economic and military power. I am told by Ethiopian friends that he sought to do this too quickly and on a large scale. Abiy should have studied Daniel arap Moi (how he handled a similar situation involving the Kikuyu in Kenya from 1978-82) and Robert Mugabe (how he handled the whites in Zimbabwe from 1980-98) for lessons on such transitions.

But the Ethiopian case is even more complicated in large part because under Zenawi, regions had been given considerable autonomy, with their own police forces and militias. This meant that any reform towards a nationalist party, central control, etc. needed to be sequenced and slow. It also meant acting carefully not to threaten entrenched Tigrayan interests by slowly eating away their power without causing them to feel immediately threatened. In purging them from the military, prosecutung their leaders for corruption and human rights abuses, Abiy appeased the priesthood but undermined the delicate balance he needed to ensure reform with stability.

****

amwenda@independent.co.ug

10 comments

  1. @ Mr.Mwenda this is hilarious, i too think he moved too quickly, besides he should have ignored those who were corrupt to maintain peace.

    • @ Gonza. This is hilarious? You seem not to understand or appreciate what it takes to build nation. True; the Ethiopian president is doing the right things.The main problem is the speed of implementing them. From my relatively extensive reading about case studies of any national building, alter a system that has ruled a country for quite a long time; 1)-you have to move very slowly like Moi or Mugabe 2)-You don’t have to threaten the economic & to some extent the political interests of those who had power before. You first tolerate and co-opt them for some years as you consolidate power and then go for them. This requires patience and takes a very long time. Otherwise, things can most likely end up like what has happened in Ethiopia

  2. Godfrey kambere

    Certain things in my my mind makes me think that showdown in the Tigray region was inevitable and was bound to hàve wider reaching internal repercussions. When the idea of the Grand Renaissance dam was debated in the capitals of the free world, I suspected Egypt and Sudan would not be in for stability in Ethiopia. Tigray provided the perfect excuse. Other neighbours like Somalia would provide a safe conduit for any logistics. Compound this with having Eritrea as a friend! The arms merchants saw a great opportunity and sadly this is one reason why African borders become handy.
    Thanks

  3. Well written, well explained. Thank you Andrew

  4. Thanks, the truth is that Ethiopia’s economy is growing faster than expected even at the midst of such internal and external pressure, according the World Bank report. Abiy is incredibly humble man with full of true human characters coupled with excellency in every aspect Ethiopia needs at 21 century. Please have a look at this video if you got time and would like to understand the underground truth more. https://youtu.be/4nr07iBPafs

  5. Andrew’ s observation is relevant and could be applicable enough to explain the dying democracies that are fully operationalize on ethnical lines in Ethiopia.

    Rightly put Andrew

  6. Andrew’ s observation is relevant and could be applicable enough to explain the dying democracy that are fully operationalize on ethnical lines in Ethiopia.

    Rightly put Andrew

  7. 1.Ethiopia has characteristics similar to that of Israel.What do i mean;she has a largely Christian based community so she is so mindful and knows the potential threat of Islam based states that surround her like Sudan and Somalia.
    2.Ethiopia has always been a fluker ;How did she get the OAU headquarters yet its not a purely black African state?
    3.The fact that she has a large expatriate community, all institutions are government owned and her strategic location to Europe and Asia gives Ethiopia an economic advantage over other African nations .
    4.Uganda and Kenya are more recognized than Ethiopia in the international arena simply coz they are common wealth states and listen to Washington rules this is actually still a big deal.
    5.Its still too early for Ethiopia to begin bragging;Ethiopia is one of those states whose rise is not so solid.actually any proxy war can leave her bruised.

    • I think what most of our (new) leaders in Africa don’t understand is that, given the conditions of most of our countries, democracy alone can’t work and dictatorship alone can’t work. We need a combination of both, but they must be applied sequentially. When Magufuli came into power, he started ruling the country in a different way from Abiy. I understood him and agreed with him because he had inherited a very corrupt country with so many other problems. I didn’t expect him to change his leadership style in his first five years in office or even at the beginning of his second term, because the problems he had inherited had become not only political, but also social, and I think they had also started becoming cultural. Our task would have been extremely difficult if they had become completely cultural.

      However, my expectation was that, during his successor’s (not Samia’s) second term in office, gradual “freedom” would start visiting our streets and villages again. We would have been under some form of repression for 15 years by then. Hopefully, if the successor had been a Magufuli and had ruled us for five years the way Magufuli had done, we would have been mentally and culturally conditioned to behave and act in a way that is beneficial to the present and several future generations. I am not advocating dictatorship over democracy, by the way. I’m talking about transforming our country (reforming our people) in much the same way as Andrew is suggesting, without necessarily turning us into subjects.

      I have a feeling that most Africans believe that it is possible to make our countries democratic and developed overnight. They say, “Democracy now, development now, etc.” How I wish it were possible for us to achieve both faster! But unfortunately, it is not and has never been possible anywhere under the sun.

  8. Enos Franklin Mutwana

    So the Tigrinya speakers ruled Ethiopia for 30 years and are not about to loose power and influence!? Ugandans should learn lessons from this war.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *