Thursday 23rd of May 2013 04:08:38 PM
 
 
 
Home The Last Word The Last Word Uganda’s culture of impunity

Uganda’s culture of impunity

Email Print PDF

How the NRM has created an unstable equilibrium in Uganda’s politics that has allowed impunity to be tolerated

In 399 BC, the popular assembly in Athens sentenced the world’s most famous philosopher, Socrates, to death. His most famous student and spokesman, Plato, was advised by friends to leave the city. He had participated in the defense of Socrates and many feared the democratic party of Athens would kill him too. At 28, Plato escaped to Egypt. There, he was surprised when – what the historian Will Durant called “the Sphinxly pundits of the Nile” – told him that the upheavals of Greece were because Athens was a young and immature nation without entrenched norms and stabilising traditions.

In many ways Uganda resembles of 5th Century BC Athens – noisy, busy, bubbling, quarrelsome, chaotic, vibrant and innovative. All too often, we debate, discuss, argue, quarrel, fight and get little done. Uganda is a country where everyone is “free” to do anything. Civil servants and politicians loot the public coffers with reckless abandon. Of course there are many struggles to rein them in – but only because one faction is seeking to settle scores with another. Some businessmen evade taxes, others, usurp public land while many build in wetlands and road reserves.

Yet even the poor in Uganda exercise impunity. Boda bodas ride through red lights often on the wrong side of the road. Taxi drivers pick passengers wherever they wish. Vendors and hawkers dump garbage on the streets. Ordinary citizens steal road signs, street lights and electricity cables. University lecturers trade sex for marks, and do little or no research to produce new knowledge. Teachers in UPE schools are in class for only 18 percent of the time. Traffic police officers act like road-toll collectors.

Those outside power (and therefore not partaking in this mad scramble for public loot) are also free to express their frustrations in newspapers, on television and radio. Often, they rely on rumour, hearsay, idle talk and gossip to make their case. They make little or no effort to verify or cross-check and substantiate their claims and accusations; so they lie and vilify. But no one holds them to account either – theirs is freedom without responsibility. Witness the work of the Red Pepper. And any false accusation that is repeated over and over again acquires the status of truths.

Everywhere in Uganda, everyone does what they want. Some call this freedom and liberty; I see it as anarchy. The best discussion of this subject is a dialogue between Socrates and Adeimantus at the latter’s home. Socrates argues that excessive freedom inevitably leads to tyranny. And 2300 years later, it did. The “freedom” (read anarchy) under the Weimer Republic in Germany produced Adolf Hitler.

Uganda seems to be in an unstable equilibrium (but an equilibrium nonetheless) where the state and the citizen, the rich and the poor, those who support the government and those who oppose it have agreed to an unwritten yet grand bargain. Here, public officials are free to pillage the treasury and deliver little in public goods and services. In return the citizens are free to exercise their own impunity of not respecting the law. And President Yoweri Museveni stands atop this chaos, fanning it but also stabilising it like Pericles did in 5th Century Athens. In many ways, Museveni is the quintessential Ugandan – stern, power-hungry and corrupt but equally kind, generous, accommodating and tolerant; he is the personification of the Ugandan character. Ugandans love and hate him in equal measure.

But the best parallel for Museveni is King Phillip 11 of Macedonia – the father of Alexander the Great. The words Durant used to describe Phillip can be used by some to our president. “In diplomacy he was friendly but treacherous,” Durant wrote, “He could break a promise with a light heart but was always willing to make another. He recognised no morals for governments and looked upon bribes and lies as humane substitutes for slaughter. He was lenient in victory and gave defeated Greeks better terms than they gave one another.” Just when Museveni has defeated an enemy militarily, he will enter “peace talks” with them – give their leaders ministerial appointments, the commanders and their soldiers will be integrated into the national army.

In many ways therefore, Museveni is a complete man. He tolerates the corrupt and incompetent in his government as he tolerates all the law breakers – rich and poor. He tolerates the potholes on the roads as he tolerates the freedom of those who quarrel in the media about them – and even throw insults at him for it. He has defended the right of boda bodas to disregard the law, the right of vendors to terrorise the city and the rights of squatters to violate the property rights of land owners. He has ignored the rich who have stolen public land, evaded taxes, built in wetlands and road reserves or killed their workers. Every Ugandan has a piece of their impunity protected and promoted by Museveni.

Museveni has been tolerant and accommodating of everything except one thing he treasures above all else – his job. It is here that he has drawn a line in the sand. For when his power is threatened – not just by tactical or even strategic threats – but by an existential threat, our president will be stern, uncompromising, quick and decisive.  He has survived in power for long because he has concentrated most of his efforts on this single objective. He is therefore flexible in his morals but passionate in his pursuit of power.

Of course Museveni could reply that he would never achieve his vision when he has been overthrown and hence in jail or exile. So keeping power is the first precondition of a successful leader. Milton Obote was an able administrator but could never achieve his vision because he was overthrown. However, one runs the risk of getting too entangled in the mechanics and machinations of retaining power that they can lose sight of the vision that took them to politics in the first place. Museveni runs this risk too. In deregulation and liberalisation, Museveni may have fostered many dysfunctions in Uganda but he also unleashed the entrepreneurial talent of Ugandans. His opponents have never learnt how this saved our country – and Museveni’s presidency – from the dead hand of a corrupt and incompetent state.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments (46)Add Comment
Saved our country, really?
written by Wycliffe, January 20, 2013
"....... He tolerates the corrupt and incompetent in his government as he tolerates all the law breakers – rich and poor. He tolerates the potholes on the roads as he tolerates the freedom of those who quarrel in the media about them – and even throw insults at him for it. He has defended the right of boda bodas to disregard the law, the right of vendors to terrorise the city and the rights of squatters to violate the property rights of land owners. He has ignored the rich who have stolen public land, evaded taxes, built in wetlands and road reserves or killed their workers. Every Ugandan has a piece of their impunity protected and promoted by Museveni........"

Wouldn't one call this a corrupt and incompetent state?

...
written by Omeros, January 20, 2013
'In deregulation and liberalisation, Museveni may have fostered many dysfunctions in Uganda but he also unleashed the entrepreneurial talent of Ugandans. His opponents have never learnt how this saved our country – and Museveni’s presidency – from the dead hand of a corrupt and incompetent state.' That there is some libertarian revisionism. Museveni was a reluctant deregulator. He was only ever able to push liberalisation while holding his nose. The rollback of the state threatened his support among that class of civil servants whom he was forced by the dictates of structural adjustment to retrench.
...
written by Omeros, January 20, 2013
He only ever affirmed rollback as a policy option because, bankrupt as Uganda was as he found it in 86, he had no leverage to defy the prescriptions of the Washington Consensus. And as Wycliffe says, the one thing Ugandans can agree upon is that M7 has bequeathed upon his countrymen a corrupt and incompetent state.
And another thing
written by Omeros, January 20, 2013
M7 is not like Philip of Macedon. Nor is he like Pericles.
To Omeros
written by Andrew M. Mwenda, January 20, 2013
Omeros, in what way is M7 unlike Philip 11 of Macedonia especially given the quote I made from Will Durant above. Are you saying you find no parallels between the two in the specific quote above? Also in regard to Pericles, presiding over a chaotic Athens but also stabilising it, are you saying you see no parallels?
To Andrew
written by Omeros, January 20, 2013
No - I don't find the comparison particularly helpful. If I were to characterise M7's governing style (and were to retain the classical theme) I would say that M7 governs more like a Roman - according to the injunction of Anchises to Aeneas - 'parcere subiectis et debellare superbos'. M7 does not have the smooth and wily cunning of Philip's military diplomacy. M7 is bluff, somewhat transparent and in many ways unhypocritical. He revels in martial courage and wears his virtus openly. And, understanding that he may be hated for his stance, he is likely to shrug and say, as Caligula - who, like M7, feuded with his Senate - is reported to have done, 'oderint dum metuant'.
brilliant
written by sammyt, January 21, 2013
Another brilliant piece from Andrew...you got it spot on an how M7 is just a microcosym of Ugandan society. Most of us are mini M7's in our little spheres of life;work, home, businesses etc. we thrive on anarchy a
To Omeros
written by Immaculate Nambi, January 21, 2013
Care to translate the latin phrases you used in your response to Andrew? I'm gist of your phrase is lost in translation, I'm afraid.

Andrew, I don't agree with your position that keeping power is the first precondition of a successful leader. What do would you characterize as "success"? I think Museveni is NOT a successful leader; the fact that he has managed to stay in power at any cost does not make him successful. My description of Museveni would be that he is a long standing dictator.
What is the solution?
written by Musinga, January 21, 2013
Andrew, this's an excellent analysis of the state of governance in Uganda. At this stage it does not matter to me how you characterise president Museveni- his weaknesses and strengths are clearly known. To most of us, the ordinary Ugandans, these historic comparisons other than flavouring your article, do very little to provide guidance to your readers in their quest to seek solutions to the mess in which our country finds itself. I am more concerned about how this culture of impunity being displayed by many Ugandans can be reversed. Could you kindly, in your next article, using your excellent base of knowledge and previleged position suggest ways of getting rid of this culture of impunity? Thank you.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
You are spot on Andrew, M7 represents the Ugandan character-do harm in the name of love/protection, do wrong or protect it in the name of tolerance and emphathy. I’ll use two examples to demonstrate this:Example one: I once travelled on a bus with a group of Ugandans from Nairobi bound for Kla. When we reached Busia border, next to immigration was a public toilet and there was a boy manning it.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
The boy collected money from whoever used it. He had made no attempt whatsoever to clean it. It was extremely dirty, murky, smelly, dark etc. I was so mad when this boy wanted money from me bse not only was he reaping where he didn’t sow, he cast the image of the country in bad light given that for a visitor this was the first point of contact with a country called Uganda.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
I refused to pay and the Ugandans with whom we had been discussing how Kenya is doing somethings right, now almost lynched me. They started their usual “bambi” where will the boy get something to eat!!!! I still refused to pay until one gentleman paid his money supposedly, on my behalf. Lesson-the boy will never do anything to improve; Ugandans will continue to wonder why public places are dirty and this mediocrity will rage on- promoted and fanned on by Ugandans.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
Example two: Kiprotich won us a Olympic golden medal after almost five decades. This is a great achievement and he deserved every attention and contribution from loving and caring Ugandans. Perfect, but here is the problem: B’se of that love, Kiprotich will never win us another medal (I hope I am wrong) b’se the money, gifts, promises, houses etc he got in one week, nothing had prepared him for that, and overnight, he felt rich and his mind is now somewhere around banks and not on the track.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
The same happened to Kiprop, Kipsiro, the lady who gave birth after winning gold etc . You see, even if people default on these promises (I hear Kipsiro has not yet received the house from the president and I am still waiting to see a training base in Bukwe in one year as promised by the president), the feeling of richness and well-off will have already settled in and since we are a mediocre group, the desire to continue working hard takes a nose-dive. Here is talent murdered at its helm in the name of love (and true love by the way).
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
His fellows in Kenya will continue running in order to be able to buy Ugali and we will keep on hearing their names at high level and Kenya shining. Now tell me, is this love or murder? M7 and majority of Ugandans converge at some point where their love for individuals promotes mediocrity and anarchy! All we need is someone who is ready (even at the risk of being a one term president) to stop this anarchy and put the country on the right and high-achieving track! So long!
Objective Analysis
written by Tina, January 21, 2013
Andrew that was a spot on analysis Ugandans have to distinguish between freedom of speech,rights,confusion,stupidity,respect for each other,being objective and realistic irrespective of one's political affiliation. I don't know whether its just a one of the cycles a country goes through as it takes off to another stage of development or we as a country are just in our own world of confusion at times it beats my understanding where you think the President or state can dictate on vital matters like construction of a dam, roads,reallocating citizens from a slum so that a modern city is built, etc but instead they are overruled as if they can not see that they are on the right track. this kind of should a call it fear to make a firm decision is letting us down.
@Omeros
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
Dear Omeros, I respect your views on this platform but I find them extreme this time. An attribute, if we want to change things, that does not help so much. You see, you could be right in your statements but majority of us have invested our hard-earned small coins in this country and our children live and study here. It therefore matters how the regime changes. Extreme, besigye-like positions are probably ocassioned but will only win you a handful of support. Majority(I hope I am right) want the situation improved without making it worse. Extreme positions will not lead us to this outcome
@Omeros
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
Let me ask (at the risk od being branded M7 sympathiser)if you were M7 and Besigye was threatening to take you to court, would you relinguish and handover yourself to him or fight on to see what tomorrow will bring? What really takes forward this country? starting from where M7 regime has ended or bringing the country down, no matter what the cost? Would this be the proverbial cutting off of the foot to get rid of the jigger? I have been in majority of African countries and Uganda has one of the most locally-owned economies (thanks to Amin), even with our current levels of mismanagement and lack of vision. We need to err on the side of moderation as a country if anything and keep moving this country forward.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
In my view therefore, we need to be wise by assuring the current crop of old, tired and recycled leaders, of their future and protection so they can even invest their stashed away cash into this economy to create jobs for us. this way, we may see people we hate on the streets but we will save and move the country forward (Moi is free in Kenya and has many people he tortured who would want him in prison -but the country would burn). Can you imagine the amount and vibrancy of business M7, Kategaya, Kivejinja, Moses Ali, Bukenya, Kajura, Tumusime, Kadaga, etc would create stepping aside to do private investments and have new people taking over? Is that not even an exciting dream that the country should work towards? Can it be achieved with extreme views? May be, may be not.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 21, 2013
Let us be moderate and accomodative in our pursuit for regime change and be extreme later in our surgical operations of governance. Like in a military rescue mission (movie experience) where our parent is hurt and kidnapped by the the bad guys/terrorists, in our rescue operation, whatever we do, we have to protect the kidnapped (evenif it means negotiating with the kidnappers, if we cant beat them). For the rescue mission to be called successful, the kidnapped has to be rescued alive and later, extreme surgical operations can be carried out to get rid of torture marks and injuries sustained. The other way round would be a total failure!
...
written by Ad, January 21, 2013
@Nambi/Musinguzi
I hold no brief for Omeros but his/her contribution in this forum is the embodiment of knowledge: simple, unpretentious and yet exposes the pettiness of those with pretention to knowledge - shamelessly flaunting that knowledge. All this perhaps in a vain attempt to appear legit even if that which to them passes as "deep learning" is in fact the very reverse!
M7 as Phillip or M7 as Caligula; any takers? And to say nothing of M7's modus operandi as captured in those classic Latin quotes!!
...
written by Omeros, January 22, 2013
Dear Musinguzi, I often doubt the ingenuousness of those who plead for 'moderation' as a strategem for besting a bully. I doubt their ingenuousness because the self-conscious display of middling values is itself an affectation, a pose, a bid, borne of insincerity, to seem reasonable, to appear serious. In truth, crowding out the centre ground is to fake responsibility rather than to take it. For moderation, the given term for appeasing the bully, is the reason that we are here in the first place. Moderation won the day when we kept our peace as challengers to the regime were one by one disappeared. Moderation prevails when we look the other way as regime insiders have looted the state. Moderation unfurled its colours when we queued up to abolish presidential term limits.
...
written by Omeros, January 22, 2013
And what is the reward for all of that moderate behaviour? It is to be threatened that soldiers will not allow parliamentary 'indiscipline'. It is to be told that "f the military feels the country is in the hands of wrong politicians, some officers might be forced to intervene in the name of refocusing the country’s future." That is the political behaviour that thoughtless moderation has both encouraged and abetted.
...
written by Omeros, January 22, 2013
If we judge those moderates who are so keen not to be branded as 'sympathisers of M7' by the effects of their actions, by their serious-sounding calls for compromise with the uncompromising, one finds them to be the greatest enablers of this regime. It is no surprise that moderate opinion holds Besigye in contempt. Moderates hate him because he shames them for their political complacency and moral cowardice. Well may they burn in deep shame.
well
written by elis, January 22, 2013
I think the biggest problem we now have is the shallowness of our political class. yet we have a very skillfull intellectual class..quoting latin stuff and comparing Museveni to guys we have never heard off. I am less critical of Museveni than u guys. I dont think he went to the liberalisation project with his hand on his nose.. I think he showed tremendous leadership by accepting the technical advice of Mutebile and co. and even carrying the political responsibility. I think on most major issues he has been willing to take risks and to push through policies even when they are terribly unpopular. I also think we many times underestimate the hand he was played or the effect of his regime on the country, its future and on the region. but he should go.
...
written by kato, January 22, 2013
"Museveni is a complete man. He tolerates the corrupt and incompetent in his government as he tolerates all the law breakers – rich and poor. He tolerates the potholes on the roads as he tolerates the freedom of those who quarrel in the ..."
BASICALLY IF YOU PROTECT AND PRACTSE EVIL YOU ARE YOURSELF EVIL IN THIS CASE CORRUPT
...
written by kato, January 22, 2013
"Of course Museveni could reply that he would never achieve his vision when he has been overthrown and hence in jail or exile."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mwenda come on... what vision does this fellow have . any that you can educate us on.
it is just about power and money . and i doubt if this can be categorized as a vision for a leader of a state however banana like it may be
...
written by Musinguzi, January 22, 2013
Ok Omeros, "the moderates are the greatest enablers of this regime" fine, what have you done or about to achieve as extremes if I may humbly ask? I think Besigye apart from reaping millions, he is burning in deep shame for he promised us a political tsunami which never happened. Come on, wake up. Look at Ethiopia, Rwanda, Eritrea, Mozambique, Angola and our Uganda; the leaders wont just be pushed as you wish. It has to be a negotiation. The earlier you see that, the more we rescue for this country. By the way, I am not keen not be called M7 sympathiser for I dont think that where my heart rests is very important or anybody's business.
@Musinguzi
written by Omeros, January 22, 2013
Dear Musinguzi - I acknowledge that I drank way too much coffee before my last set of responses to you and I apologise for my tone.
...
written by OJA, January 23, 2013
The worst thing that ever occured to Uganda was M7 ascending to the presidency. Coup leaders elsewhere were brilliant nationalists and people who cared for the common good, for instance, Thomas Sankara, JJ Rawlings, Meles Zenawi, Paul Kagame...Museveni is neither a leader nor a nationalist. He is an evil man, egocentric and a cabbage-like (inward looking)! Obote was a far better leader than him. Amin was a lot better except for lack of education and bad propaganda from the West...Uganda is doomed! M7, his family and relatives must one day pay for this!
For Oja
written by Winnie, January 23, 2013
Oja careful what you say this page is for only n only brillant people. such silly comments will leave you with brusies. most crazy guys on this page are now in rehab ask Adam he is responding well to treatment and is ready for the NRM celebrations on the 30th . you seem to have just received your PLE results .please if you need any help Butabika is free of charge..i dont have enough words to thank M7. most ugandans who were ruled by Amin up to now still have cracked feet coz of walking long distances and most of them lost their tooth coz of fighting for Sugar and Salt which was for Ambassadors & Ministers.
@ Omeros
written by Musinguzi, January 23, 2013
Dear Omeros, no bad blood brother. You have every right to be angry for we have been terribly mismanaged as a country by M7. It is even natural to be annoyed at anyone who might sound like they continue to support his regime given the rot. And yet, by allowing M7 to incite and polarize us, in there lies the archiles heal of those seeking to remove him. For in a normal bell-shaped curve, at both extremes lies only a small fraction of any population. When we get so mad and extreme therefore, we run the risk of distancing ourselves from the bigger part of the population and the issues affecting them.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 23, 2013
This way, we do not grow our support base to uproot a rotten regime and yet, although M7 might also not have adequate numbers, he has government machinations to manipulate the figures and numbers for him to ‘win’. This way, my small brain does not show me the arithmetic of the opposition uprooting M7. It appears to me therefore that people like Otunnu, Mao who sounded uncompromising in the beginning are coming to realize this humbling fact and their parties now are calling on NRM bullies for dialogue.
...
written by Musinguzi, January 23, 2013
For standing on a podium to tell Ugandans that M7 is a dictator, corrupt and his government has failed in service delivery is not news at all to any Ugandan and is not a vote winner anymore. We have to think of practical solutions. It is for this reason that I think although moderation would sound like cowardice and sell-out but to me it brings us closer to the national goal than polarisation. In here lies a reason I will support Muntu but wouldn’t waste my time on Besigye. Of course you have your choice and I am not saying mine is the right one- I am only stating it.
...
written by Gen Adam Kifaliso, January 24, 2013
we are all for one , and one for all , its nice Winne has not pulled us down , she is yet to comment and the debate is epistemic beyong her brain power
Business Man
written by Khim, January 24, 2013
good article but it provides no solutions and it shouldn't anyway. Everybody knows the solution. When you want to remove an anthill please kill the queen ant first (in luganda known as Namunswa), then embark on destroying the anthill. To destroy the anthill without fatally maiming the queen, is to render her a comeback. So even now in Uganda deal with the queen bee decisively and completely and then embark on sustainable improvement of the welfare of Ugandans.
...
written by Jeje, January 24, 2013
Winnie and Adam Kifaliso need to enjoy some time in bed together (if they have not already). They seem to be in love.
...
written by winnie, January 24, 2013
Matters of socrates and plato are not for me so i cant force myself and deceive people that i know such issues. besides that i studied international Economics like Christine Lagard so i understand matters to do with Stock Exchange,GDP,shares,bonds,price index ,Treasury Bills and matters in that area. Jeje just excuse Adam he has really suffered on this page for the sins he committed voluntarily. i would be toooo stupidddddd to make a comment on what you have raised i still have dignity and sense left in me.
Wrong forum?
written by Musinga, January 24, 2013
Winnie and Adam are definitely on the wrong forum here! I do advise them to consider making their comments, preferably, on a "tabloid" forum.
Unhelpful, Anachronistic Irrelevancy
written by Ocheto, January 25, 2013
This is kind of nonsensical, historical irrelevancy Museveni and his ilk has been using to browbeat Ugandans into following them to hell-on-earth politics. Who cares what the hell happened from the days of Gilgamesh and Ur and Sumeria through the Greeks and Biblical times to Dark and Middle ages and unto the accidental founding of modern history. After learning all that all you have to show for it is how to imitate Caligula? It is pathetic.
Unhelpful, Anachronistic Irrelevancy
written by Ocheto, January 25, 2013
Museveni and his NRM are just power hungry simpletons who have been all over place: they tried Marxism, then afterwards when forced expediently switched to market democracy. Now they are stuck, because there is neither a market nor democracy. It's the height of capitulation if you, the government, have to blame your subjects, people for your failures. The role of government is to lead people; to show equal concern for the fate every one; And to respect the right of each person to make something of their lives. Short of that the government whether ancient or modern is worthless.
...
written by mike , January 25, 2013
on 8th October 2012, your excellency repented on his and Uganda's behalf for all the evils you mentioned. we should now remind him to walk the repentance he made and believe that we shall start anew! Uganda has degenerated so low that we need a national dialogue? truth and reconciliation conference? where we tell it all, repent, forgive and start afresh!! what do you think?
MUSEVENI IS DELUSIONAL
written by gafabusa, January 25, 2013
If M7 wants to make a coup and dismiss parliament, that is the end of him, Obote imprisoned parliamentarians and abrogated the constitution, he won the battle then, but lost the war in the end. If M7 can pull off that stint, he will not only go, but Muhoozi will fight for survival instead of power all his life. Corruption was sowed in the mustard seed and was displayed when M7 grabbed the UPDF ranch and made it his own, he thought Mukura, Muhwezi, Mbabazi, Kazinda, Jamwa, Kaboyo where not watching his actions copied the General, as you know a team is as strong as its captain.
Mr
written by Pmunu, January 25, 2013
I just wish God could give M7 another 50 years. He has really managed Ugandans. Leadership is a big issue in this country, the alternatives to M7 are just sharks waiting to slice off the wealth of this country.
...
written by Gen Adam Kifaliso, January 25, 2013
Ok , thanks guys the discussion is great , its has moves principles of relativity's to accurate scrutiny of the status quo in Uganda.
If politics were Tennis then Mack enrol would be still competing like grand slum, its how my dear leader m7 wishes to be ,he wants to be players as long as he can feel the need to wee before he wets his pants ,at least be an empire regulating the game from an elevated stand .the problem here is that the player is no longer interested in play but the chants of spectators who he has promised part of his pay , to many he is not entertaining anymore but spoiling the game and its high time he retired to save the Sport ,I know this could be to much for Winnie to comprehend but I sure she will catch with the rest of flock
deregulation
written by seremani, January 27, 2013
"In deregulation and liberalisation, Museveni may have fostered many dysfunctions in Uganda but he also unleashed the entrepreneurial talent of Ugandans." ....please tell that to your friend P.K. .... Rwanda is poor because too much regulations suffocate the entrepreurial talents of Rwandans, one of the bigest mistake of RPF... it seems like there want too much regulations so they can be the only one to run business in Rwanda

Write comment

busy
 
 
 
 

Podcasts

Videos

You need Flash player 6+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.





RECOMMENDED

Society
Getting the best from your battery A well maintained new battery should last for at least five years If you’ve ever suffered the frustration of trying to switch on your engine only to find a flat car battery, you know what a stressf...
 

MOST READ

LATEST COMMENTS

airline passengers bill of rights essentially on april 2915 Says:
2013-05-23 01:11:05
I'm pretty new at this place and adore the design, could you let me know me where you bought this theme? You can contact me on my e-mail...looking forward to hear from you

Hank Says:
2013-05-23 02:39:52
Those who believe its within Obamas Job description to remove African Head of states they assume are dictators are just Shallow minded and are still under the colonial spell. Wherever the US goes to

ON THE SHELVES
Banner
 

Cover: Muhoozi Project - The Inside Story.

News Analysis: DPP, Police row - A legal perspective.

Business: Few options for 2013/14 budget.


Name:

Email:

COMMENT
Free press for an engaged society Safe to Speak: Securing Freedom of Expression in All Media World Press Freedom Day is marked every May 3 to celebrate t...