Doesn’t a country that lost a million people deserve to protect its people against the threat of another genocide?
In a space of one week in July, the Netherlands, Germany, UK and USA announced they would cut their aid to Rwanda over its alleged involvement in the ongoing rebellion in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are another pointer to the dangers of Western aid to poor countries. The use of aid as an instrument of blackmail is a common practice by Western Europe and its offshoots in North America, Australia and New Zeeland. In almost all official and unofficial relations with recipients, Western donors keep rubbing in the fact that those recipients should behave themselves lest... This “lest” includes a series of threats such as cutting aid, sending a leader to the International Criminal Court (ICC) or imposing sanctions.
A Western NGO may launch a campaign against a poor country for behaving in a manner inconsistent with its (the NGO’s) desires. This NGO will immediately receive support from the Western journalists and their news organisations as the platforms for this campaign. Then a Western academic who is an “expert” on the poor country will appear in the media and publish a paper supporting the claims of the first two. These will win over a section of the local African elite with an axe to grind against their government to legitimise their claims. This concerted action will “force” the governments in the West to act with the blackmail of cutting aid or even worse.
I put “forced” in inverted commas because often, Western NGOs, journalists and academics have a common agenda with their governments based on a shared attitude, values, interests and norms. The result is that threats of aid cuts force governments of poor countries to respond by working to please aid givers rather than their own citizens. Thus, although Western governments, journalists, academics and activists are the leading self-appointed vanguards in the cause of democracy in our countries, the effect of their actions is to undermine democracy. Aid is the vehicle through which the interests of the donors are placed above the interests of citizens.
I used to think that anyone who gives you money would tend to act in such a manner. Yet Western countries are not the only ones that give aid. China and Japan do. But hardly does anyone hear them issue threats. This cannot be because they are undemocratic. Japan is as democratic as it gets. Besides, the worst dictatorships in Africa – wakina Mobutu Sese Seko, Samuel Doe, Siad Barre, etc have historically been propped by the West whenever it served their interests. Thus Asian restraint from interfering in the domestic politics of the recipients of their aid seems to be born of a deep seated and genuine respect for the sovereignty of poor countries.
Western aid comes with too many lectures and sermons on how our leaders should manage our affairs – always by adopting the policies, practices and institutions of the donor country. It is difficult to develop or emancipate one’s people when the actions taken are aimed at pleasing international masters rather than domestic constituencies. It is through aid and these emergent international institutions like the ICC that the West seems to be seeking to regain what it lost through decolonisation.
In the week the donors cut aid to Rwanda, a low level official in the State Department had the audacity to threaten President Paul Kagame with indictment before the ICC – an institution his own country has refused to subject itself to. All this is based on allegations in an addendum to a UN report. Never mind that the authors of the report did not even bother to ask Rwanda government officials to respond to accusations made against them individually and collectively. The authors say their sources are DRC officials and civilians. Western nations say they have deeply entrenched principles of fairness and natural justice. Was the disregard of such principles a mere oversight?
But let us assume, just for argument’s sake, that Rwanda is actively involved in arming M23 and supporting its operations. In 1994, it lost one million people in a space of 100 days and an entire country was devastated. The perpetrators of this evil are right across the border from Rwanda in eastern DRC – fully armed and sometimes supplied by Kinshasa. In eastern DRC live Tutsis with a shared existential threat as many in the leadership of Rwanda. Yet Rwanda is expected to do nothing about it. The country that is hosting these criminals is not being asked to account for its complicity in this problem. The UN has 17,000 troops in DRC who have never arrested even one killer. Instead it is asking the victims of genocide to sit back and wait until they are exterminated – exactly what it asked them to do in 1994.
Let us assume that it is the principle of international relations that a country should not get involved in another directly by having troops there or indirectly by supporting a local militia whose interests converge with its own. Therefore, Rwanda is only being asked to respect this established practice that all other nations adhere to. If Rwanda adopted this do-nothing-policy and the criminals invaded, who would be held accountable? The UN which failed it in 1994, Human Rights Watch and its leader Kenneth Roth who seems to care more about Africans in Congo than the millions of African-Americans rotting in jails in America, or is it the Americans, British, Germans and Dutch who by cutting aid are forcing the Rwanda government into inaction?
On September 9, 2011, the United States lost 3,000 people, four planes, two prominent buildings and a quarter of another. In response, it mobilised its NATO allies and they have for the last eleven years occupied Afghanistan – a country that is 20,000km from America. Among these NATO members are the Dutch, UK and Germany. They bomb, they kill and they rule there. Note: there was not a single Afghan citizen involved in 9/11; they were all Saudis and Egyptians. The only thing Afghanistan did was to harbour the perpetrators. Doesn’t Rwanda that lost a million people and an entire country deserve to also get involved in DRC – right across its border – where there is no state to protect its people against the threat of another genocide?
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

written by Rajab Kakyama, August 04, 2012
written by D. Oduki, August 04, 2012
If there were many more Africans who felt as passionate about this issue as you Andrew, Africa's problems would be over.
I agree with you overall but what baffles me is WHY or WHY did African countries/ leaders sign themselves in at the ICC ????
I will have no sympathy for any African leader indicted by the ICC who has signed in.
Why wait till you are indicted and then complain about the injustice by the west ?
Un-sign the treaty now before you are indicted or shut up when you get indicted !
Really Pathetic, no wonder African's get walked all over by the west !
written by david, August 05, 2012
written by Moses nuwagaba, August 05, 2012
written by Moses nuwagaba, August 05, 2012
written by Lt .Col Adam kifaliso, August 05, 2012
written by H, August 05, 2012
- One has to make a decision: either Banyamulenges are Congolese, and therefore of no concern to Rwanda, or they are Rwandan, in which case they are of concern to Rwanda but one should question their presence in DRC. Please, have some consistency.
- M23 doesn't represent the Banyamulenges of DRC. Ask yourself why the FRF, the armed group representing the South Kivu Banyamulenges, didn't join the M23 and instead is remaining loyal to FARDC...
written by H, August 05, 2012
- M23 forced FARDC to concentrate on Goma (town of 1 million people, as much as Kigali, only logic they concentrate on its defense), leaving open space in South Kivu for MM Yakutumba and FDLR. So in fact, the M23 threat on Goma puts Banyamulenges of South Kivu in danger.
written by H, August 05, 2012
written by Andrew Illogical Mwenda, August 05, 2012
Ever since I read on Twitter him saying that Rwanda is like Israel I am convinced of that.
He keeps comparing apples and donkeys.
Just like when he says that USA attacked Afghanistan after 9/11
Andrew... USA did it on claims that the terrorist were from there.
Congo has not attacked Rwanda. You still cannot convince the world that guarding the borders isn't the right thing to do.
written by Andrew Illogical Mwenda, August 05, 2012
FDLR if they even still exist are weak, underarmed, underqualified, undertrained compared to Rwandan army.
So either Rwandan army is incompetent for 18 years and unable to dead the issue, or they aren't really trying or they are lying and that is not what they are doing there in the first place..
written by Andrew Illogical Mwenda, August 05, 2012
I got a question for you Andrew, if you don't want no collaboration with the westerners as you call them since they are the problem and they twist everything and they are crazy how about the gov refusing all aid.
written by Andrew Illogical Mwenda, August 05, 2012
My I remind you all that 8 million black men and women have died in this. I know it means nothing to your blood thirsty money hungry mentality but I think it is worth stating over and over and over and over again. 8000 000.
i hear no Rwandan saying "Never again" for them. What hypocrisy. It is sad truly.
written by H, August 05, 2012
written by Garyhills, August 06, 2012
written by Judith, August 06, 2012
written by Sewy, August 06, 2012
written by H, August 06, 2012
Nous ne pouvons pas nous empêcher de croire que ces criminels ne soient des alliés objectifs de ceux qui endeuillent notre pays par une guerre insensée au Nord-Kivu et qu’ils tentent désespérément de l’importer au Sud-Kivu . Nous demandons à toutes les Communautés de notre Province de s’élever comme un seul homme et faire échec à cette entreprise qui fait son bonhomme de chemin par ces criminels interposés.
written by H, August 06, 2012
Pour la Communauté Banyamulenge :
----------------------------
Enock RUBERANGABO SEBINEZA
Député Honoraire
Président National, SHIKAMA/Banyamulenge
So Andrew, stop talking crap by saying M23 represents the Banyamulenges of DRC. The Banyamulenges themselves say they are not represented by M23, as written above by their leader. Misinformation is not journalism!
written by BlaiseN, August 06, 2012
written by Diblo Dibala, August 06, 2012
written by Tina, August 06, 2012
written by Maceni, August 06, 2012
written by Denis Musinguzi, August 07, 2012
written by marvin ya kuku, August 08, 2012
- Mwenda, explain more the threat from Congo to Rwanda. You talk of Genocide but I do not see it. Not to the levels of 94. Not even close. I only see a threat to the current establishment, threats that can be easily remedied without war.
- The whole region should start being objective. How is it in your interests to talk about foreign aid when a report claims your nation is destabilising. We really need a massive hippy movement in Africa that focusses on the real basic Human Rights issues rather than men who want to talk about US involvement in Afghanistan and NGOs when when talking about African problems
written by Lt .Col Adam kifaliso, August 08, 2012
written by continue reading, August 10, 2012
written by Muzukulu, August 10, 2012
written by Steven Nsubuga, August 10, 2012
After all, without western powers speaking up on Human rights and freedom, what do you think African dictators would be doing now? Total calamitous situation would be written all over Africa beyond what it already is.
There would have been no elections however sham they are in Uganda. We would be running under the tutelage of Movement system where M7 would rule for life!
written by John, August 10, 2012
written by Barry O, August 10, 2012
written by Barry O, August 10, 2012
written by Ocheto, August 10, 2012
written by Omeros, August 11, 2012
written by Lt .Col Adam kifaliso, August 11, 2012
written by Omeros, August 11, 2012
written by Biragane, August 11, 2012
written by James Smith, August 11, 2012
i hope to present it sometime in 2013 at your Alma mater, once i sift through the treasure trove of information and separate fact from fiction.I still need to figure out how rwanda ties into all of this.
You were highly regarded @ your alma mater. i am curious to see what the response will be. Time will tell
written by mike d, August 15, 2012
written by Louis Vuitton Bags, August 18, 2012
written by Shafic, August 26, 2012
my advise is that get deeper into the issue before you put yo comment.
Thank you Andrew and others who try to be genuine in their reason.











