Wednesday 23rd of May 2012 02:11:22 PM
 
 
 
Home The Last Word The Last Word Why opposition needs optimism

Why opposition needs optimism

E-mail Print PDF

When I was growing up, my dad always told me that if I have a dream, I should believe that I will realise it. He believed that success comes from optimism and self-confidence. “Believe in yourself and those around you,” he would say, “and always look at why you should succeed rather than why you may fail and you will realise your dreams.”

On many (but certainly not all) occasions this advice has helped me to overcome adversity. Each time I have fallen, I have rallied in the belief of my abilities and the support of friends and family to rise again. I have equally found this attitude in the achievements of nearly all successful people and organisations I have read about; they believed in themselves, had faith in their followers/customers and were optimistic about the future.

Just imagine the odds of a Kwame Nkrumah challenging the colonial state and its racial ideology; a Nelson Mandela challenging the oppressive and discriminatory policies of Apartheid South Africa; a state commanding enormous financial, intellectual, institutional, and technological resources. Imagine a Martin Luther King Jr. and his campaign for civil rights in the southern states of the USA – having to fight the terror of the KKK, the machinations of Edgar Hoover at the FBI and the ideology of white supremacy.

The lesson from such experiences is that with confidence and optimism, human beings can overcome seemingly insurmountable odds. But this optimism and self-confidence is poorly developed in the opposition in Uganda. In every meeting or conference we have had locally or with international guests, Uganda’s opposition leaders and civil society activists paint a picture of doom and gloom.

They mourn their lack of financial resources, they complain about President Yoweri Museveni’s machinations to steal votes, they agonise about bribery and intimidation, they wail at violence meted out against their supporters by state security agents etc. Although I share these concerns, I disagree with their defeatist attitude.

First, we should take it as a given that the state in Uganda will try every rule in the book of illegality and illegitimacy to cling to power – it is the rational thing to do because rulers do not surrender power easily. The challenge for the opposition is to craft a message that can inspire hope in people so that together they can build the organisational capacity to contain violence, intimidation and vote rigging most especially in those areas where it has great potential to challenge state-sponsored terror and theft.

Indeed, the opposition needs to strike an optimistic tone precisely because Museveni and the NRM have put many obstacles in its way that. By sounding negative, they demoralize their supporters. For example, by complaining about violence, election rigging, bribery and intimidation all the time, they have created a perception that there is no hope in the electoral process. This generates apathy in the population, a factor that partly explains low voter turnout in recent by elections.

The opposition needs to mobilize and motivate people to register in large numbers and later to vote. This demands that it articulates a message that promises success – even in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds. People need to be told that change is possible; that they have the power to influence their destiny – regardless of state violence. They need to tell voters that success will come from hard work, self-confidence, optimism and sheer tenacity and patriotic zeal. You cannot demoralize people and expect to rally their enthusiasm to seek change.

Secondly, Museveni and the NRM have a string of achievements in the economic realm that the opposition can leverage for win elections. For example, economic growth has produced a sizeable private sector and a professional middleclass that can be mobilized to support further democratic reform. Reducing infant mortality rates have created a demographic map where the vast majority of voters are youths who can give the opposition a chance. The spread of telecommunications and internet gives the opposition mobilizational tools that the state has little control over.

Yet the opposition has remained trapped in complaints about newspapers not giving them voice and radio stations denying them airtime. Instead of articulating a vision of how to overcome the obstacles imposed on their campaigns by the state, they keep agonizing about them. If Museveni blocks them from FM radio stations, let them stream a radio of line in urban areas and record cassettes and distribute them to people in villages. There is SMS, MMS, word of mouth rumors – the list is endless.

The opposition in Uganda cannot even see the immense opportunities in front of them. Museveni’s hold on power has been eroding. From a high of 75 percent in of the total vote in 1996, he fell to 59 percent in 2006; and from five million votes in 2001, he fell to four million in 2006 – in a space of only five years and this in spite of violence, intimidation and vote rigging. Clearly therefore, the potential for change is great.

But listen to the opposition speak – it is all doom and gloom. Yet with so many unemployed youth, underpaid medical workers and teachers, disenfranchised hawkers and vendors, landless peasants and squatters, disgruntled middleclass professionals, hundreds of thousands of angry students, the room for opposition politics is enormous.

A recent Daily Monitor opinion poll showed that only 44 percent of voters support Museveni. However, it also showed that he main opponent, Kizza Besigye, is standing almost 10 percent below him at 35 percent. Given that Besigye got 38 percent during the last election, this decline of three percent shows that those who are disenchanted with Museveni are not actually joining the opposition.

The opposition should speak about our abilities, not inabilities; about what we are capable of, not what Museveni will do to stop us from our goals. Let them tell us what makes us great, not how we are helpless victims of the machinations of one man. I want to hear the opposition tell us how we can succeed, not how we will be frustrated in our pursuits; they should stop being negative all the time and be positive for once.

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments (31)Add Comment
Couldnt agree more
written by Rwakaikaraa, July 06, 2010
My surprise is that with all the intellectual capital in the opposition ranks, they can not see these (in my view) common sense points. For instance at the moment, they are spending all their energy and money explaining in advance why the elections in 2011 are already lost to the NRM. Even Otunnu with his much hyped intelligence and experience has made his campaign a single issue - takeing M7 to the ICC!. When he is not talking of ICC he is trying to rewrite the history of the Luwero war. Then we wonder why M7 always wins.
Eng
written by David Basobokwe, July 06, 2010
Dear Andy,
I lauphed throughout reading your piece. The opposition all behave like children seeking attention of a mother. Look at Ottunu. He thinks Obama can make him a Uganda president. Besigye who grabbed my classmate only talks of agende. The rest are actually spoilers and nothing more.
M7 has failed. Opposition has failed even more. Voters are the losers.
written by new springtime, July 06, 2010
I keep saying it on this space. Saddest story of Uganda politics is colossal failure of opposition parties. M7 and NRM have tons of failures. But they benefit much from bigger blunders by our opposition. Up to now, 6 months before elections, can you name 3 things that IPC will do differently or 3 new projects DP will implement? By this time in the '08 U.S. election, I could name >30 new ideas Obama had. Even in the U.K election, Cameron's plans were very different from Brown's. Sharp new ideas from Uganda parties are lacking. What direction do they want to take Uganda? A vision that can galvanize, inspire the nation?
M7 has failed. Opposition has failed even more. Voters are the losers - II
written by new springtime, July 06, 2010
My reading of Ug political scene is that it is going to take massive people power to uproot M7 regime. Can you think of any opposition leader who can get 1 million people marching in Kampala tomorrow? Which one of these so-called leaders can cause the economy to grind to a complete halt simply by calling for a boycott? Opposition leaders are simply too inarticulate and totally lacking in charisma. This point in our history requires a Martin Luther King or a Nelson Mandela or a Mahatma Gandhi among opposition. No single party leader has risen to that call of history. They're even less charismatic than M7. Imagine that !!!
M7 has failed. Opposition has failed even more. Voters are the losers - III
written by new springtime, July 06, 2010
A clear, alternative vision is critical because it galvanizes and rallies the masses. People can sacrifice for it, even die for it. Without a clearly articulated vsion, no success should be expected by parties. By lacking in this area, the parties shoot themselves in the feet. They defeat themselves even before the battle starts. Do you think King could have defeated the KKK white supremacists without articulating his "dream" or Mandela without spelling the "ideal" he "cherished"? Please, please wake up Opposition! Merely trampeting your kiboko scars will not win victory. What do you have for Uganda? The vision thing... Tell us!
The opposition is sophomoric and the middle class lacks political consciousness
written by Ocheto, July 06, 2010
Everything opposition is doing is so sophomoric it doesn't raise to the level of challenging the corrupt power status quo, to inspire the masses to enjoin them in the fight for badly needed change. Instead of taking on Museveni at the national level they are running around the world expecting the world to come to their rescue. Nobody is going to rescue Ugandans from the corrupt dictatorship, except Ugandans themselves, led by capable leaders. Unfortunately even with your exhortations about the elite, the middle class, and so on there is no evidence that the so-called middle class has any political consciousness. If it exits it is a politically dead, asleep class, as it has been corruptively co-opted to passivity and political apathy.
weak VS very weak
written by zake, July 06, 2010
Mwendas analysis of the opposition draws much water, because the truth is, M7 is not too strong it is just that the opposition is too weak and disorganized and their support emanates from M7s failure to make a decision and take a back seat in NRM as an elder patron, eventually someone will have to make a decision for him or God, because he will surely never make that decision. The percentage of protest votes against M7 is higher than genuine support for the opposition’s programs. An Inspiring, unifying, captivating, hopefully different and unique leadership is lacking, to do things differently and create equal opportunities, decent jobs, improve service delivery , rights and quality of life to Ugandans.
Opposition do not let us down again with poor planning
written by Thereza, July 06, 2010
It has been heart breaking over the past decade to see the Ssebaanas, Besigyes, and Mirias out-foxed, out-thought, out-manouevred, out-hustled, and out-organized by M7. Now I see the same tell-tale signs once again!! The political divisions in opposition (IPC vs. DP-Mao, Suubi vs. DP), incoherent messaging and poor branding (still no 5-bullet-point messages or catchy sound bites), poor grassroots mobilization, poor strategies (e.g. too much focus on Kiggundu, too little on M7), inferior organization (contrast with 30,000 attendees at NRM meeting intended for 8,000) etc.. It is deja vu!! When will our opposition wake up???????
Will Uganda opposition leaders prove worthy?
written by Apolot, July 06, 2010
In 1992, I was in Nairobi for a conference and I asked a Kenyan friend who supported the opposition what he thought about the coming elections. He told me that he was about to do the unthinkable, i.e. to vote for Moi. Astounded by this answer, I asked him why. He said that the opposition leaders had failed to put country before personal egos and that FORD, the opposition movement of those days, had split into splinter factions. In so doing they had handed clear victory to Moi. Their failures, he reasoned, had shown their true inadequacies. Honestly, if the Uganda opposition keep messing up, I might do the unthinkable! Go figure...
The real test for IPC and the opposition
written by Malia, July 06, 2010
There is one simple test for the IPC that will determine whether they deserve or are ready for power. It is their ability to unite all the opposition forces under one umbrella. If they can do that, I think everyone, even die-hard movementists need to support IPC. It will have proved their true nationalistic character. Even a woman, when courted by a man, puts the suitor to several tests to prove his love for her. So this is the test for IPC. If they can humble themselves, revise their protocol to overcome Mao's suspicions and bring him on board, then they deserve to be voted into power. If the opposition fail this test, they don't deserve power at all.
Mwenda loses points
written by Samuel Lingula, July 06, 2010
Mwenda asserts that Dr. Besigye support retrogressed by 3%. whereas I have no other reasons to say otherwise but using statistical data for a survey does not require nimble hands. The true figure may lie between a range and you can conclusively say that it is below or after unless you have a confidence interval (CI)or standard deviation (SD). You may be surprised that depending on SD or CI Kaguta and Dr. Besigye's figures are the same. That is the beauty of statistics. Mwenda, stay away from that. Use other analytical tools to plea your stuff.
You can not blame all this on the opposition!
written by Omuzinyi, July 06, 2010
M7's over extended stay in power is partly responsible for this political malaise in our country! This is the most fundamental reason why a change in leadership in necessary in Uganda. The day the majority in parliament scrapped term limits established this quagmire. The luck of foresight in that decision saddled our country with the redundant and anachronistic culture on one man rule. A culture that stifles individual initiative, and sees any difference of opinion and independent creative thinkers as threats to the status quo!

You can not blame all this on the opposition! # 2
written by Omuzinyi, July 06, 2010
Real change can only take place in Uganda's politics if we stop scapegoating our opposition leaders and support, advise them in confidence in their effort, however, flawed, to end the over extended rule of one man! We need them as much as they need us!
You can not blame all this on the opposition! # 3
written by Omuzinyi, July 06, 2010
If we go by the premise of Mwenda's optimism, great political leaders are not born, they are made by circumstances if given a chance! Even Obama and other great leaders had real setbacks and doubters in their political careers. There is no doubt a leader can emerge by election day from among our fledgling opposition candidates. Their leadership wings have simply been denied an opportunity by the over extended rule of one man!
A CRITICAL VIEW OF HISTORY CAN HELP!
written by OJA, July 07, 2010
There is some truth in what Mwenda presents. But a critical assessment of the entire situation from the historical point of view tells one to reflect further. The opposition in Uganda was intentionally "hybernated" and then demonised for twenty years before space was allowed for them to resuscitate. That was more than a simple damage one can imagine in the promotion of political pluralism. In fact now people in Uganda think more about individual merit that replaced opposition than democratic pluralism. It's like land that has been exhausted for a long time. To regain its fertility takes more time than expected. On the other hand complaining about harassments, killings etc. is not a sign of weakness or defeat!
...
written by Major Adam Kifaliso, July 07, 2010
Our opposition leaders need our support not and blame , all party leaders must stop seeing themselves as would next big men ,m7 has managed to isolate them rewarding and attacking them individualy with brute force,they need to see themselves as leaders of a big organisation that is seeking to save Uganda from catastrophy which NRM is actively seeking , It is true NRM has failed and we need to dislodge it from presidency of this country,our paliarment is fake oversize and parastic where many MPs think they represent m7 and not the people who elected them, We now have Amama Mbabazi heading the vote rigging Desk in the state house .he is now facilitating the New Districts not the minister concerned ,NRM is lost and Uganda needs to be saved at all cost s
...
written by Katindo, July 07, 2010
Good analysis, but the tone is wrong. Why berate the opposition when you start off by reminding us of your dad's counsel about being positive? Why not simply spend the next X months being part of the solution in a positive way: Pointing out how this sick, bloated once giant can be brought down with minimum collateral damage. That's where we need you, Mwenda
The Opposition!
written by Charles, July 07, 2010
If Mwenda is not part of the oppositiopn, and only a critic of the opposition, then who is the opposition?
If the opposition is not functioning among the people of Uganda, and articulating the aspirsations of the prople of Uganda, then what is the worth of the opposition?
If Journalists and the press are merely to make commentaries on what the government is doing or not doing how would we expect governance to improve?
It is amazing that Ugandans still talk of democratic leadership when one man and his wife have occupied state house for more that two decades, and they are still going strong. Did Joseph Mobutu not say that he had improved the economy of Zaire too? Wake up, young men! Take your responsibilities seriously.
It the opposition leaders in the arena that really count, not their critics!
written by Omuzinyi, July 07, 2010
Perhaps in Uganda's epic struggle against the tyranny of one man rule, we need to be constantly reminded of Ted Roosevelt's famous rendering:
" .. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena,.. who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; ..."
Opposition : heroic, visionary and very promising !
written by Dr G.H.Kkolokolo (Paris / France), July 08, 2010
The joyous scenes embracing Mao's recent visit abroad have said it! It's NRM, the spoilers, to blame for suffocating the opposition. Help the opposition to gather its very potential energy, unity among its ranks regardless of their different ideological commitments, approaches, and strategies! Support them in their aspiration against bad governance and all its affiliations! Spare any opposition group hammer NRM. Say nothing about DP's Mao when you have always said nothing about M7. Strengthen the opposition further by attending massively their rallies, by subscribing to their projects ( you know they aren't well-moneyed!) and by leaving no stone unturned until you see them in State House, come 2011, the year of victory!
Dr G.H.Kkolokolo (Paris / France), a DP elder.
Burying your heads in the sand
written by Mpagi, July 08, 2010
All you opposition supporters out there who are pretending parties are doing a good job, shame on you! The blunders of M7 do not "suffocate" the opposition. A smart opposition should take advantage of those same blunders to win massive support. As M7 can no longer blame Obote, opposition can no longer blame NRM. M7 surrounds himself with "yes" men who tell him what he wants to hear instead of the truth. You opposition supporters want to do the same now? You tell IPC & DP they're doing well when they're flopping. They need to hear the truth!! They have to change drastically or else they fail. Stop pretending. Opposition must change!
Burying your heads in the sand: Part 2
written by Mpagi, July 08, 2010
For there to be regime change, opposition parties must change immediately. Time is running out already! They must stop immediately this nonsense of bickering with one another and splitting into factions and counter-factions. This must stop right now, if we are to have time to concentrate on electing a new prez. Why do you all pretend that our parties are doing well when all they do is fight each other? Why don't you call a spade a spade? Which one is a true friend, the one who tells you to relax when your feet are full of jiggers or the one who drags you to the clinic? The hypocritical friends of IPC/DP are saying it is OK. No, it is not OK!!
Opposition's steadfastness : a very excellent show !
written by Dr G.H.Kkolokolo (Paris / France), July 08, 2010
In answer to Mr Mpagi's observations above, I say M7 needs not refer to Obote any more, he's dead!
But for the opposition M7 and his NRM and all affiliations are readily present with all means to suffocate efforts of opposition. The opposition isn't flopping but trying to resurrect from ashes where it has been condemned for yrs!!! And its efforts are paying because they witness M7 / NRM regular decline in popularity and in polls! Party infighting or interparty mishaps are a question thrown to the populace for guidance! For us in DP we're for Mao's official executive, and any other faction won't get our support! We call on them to return to the true fold! You see! Don't wither in despair but act in optimism!
Dr G.H.Kkolokolo (Paris / France), a DP elder.

PAST LEADERS ARE INCONSEQUENTIAL AFTER 25YEARS
written by zake, July 08, 2010
After leading the country for 25 years, all the other past leaders regimes are inconsequential, because thats a long enough period not only to mitigate past mistakes but to reverse any trend and start afresh. Uganda became independent 48 years ago, of which M7 has ruled 25 years and 12 million Ugandans have been born during his regime, so you cant blame the past dead leaders when you have been an incumbent for a quarter a century. Telling the truth as it is, is a necessary leadership quality, to say in public what you believe in private.
COME OUT PLEASE
written by Milton Spencer, July 09, 2010
Iam suggesting that U Mr Andew Mwenda come out and stand for President in the next elections. U always suggest solutions to problems, ways of politicians winning,why dont U come out and use those methods and redeem us? Please I implore you to come out. Thanks in advance Sir.
...
written by Major Adam Kifaliso, July 09, 2010
rewarding ex service men , recruiting former enemies and now making endless tours of NAADs funded single-goat-farms and these do they realy mean a man who has lost his bearings and needs to be put is a storage compartment ,grave or ward
The worst thing the dictator is doing now is to go around handing out CASH to people he has let down for so long ,he has caused suffering and disabled many and sent the country is the state of hopelessness.
Ugandans must know m7 is simply destroying Uganda whether he does it willingly or as result of ignorence time will tell, But Ugandans deserve better and must work hard to end this bad situation
probnostication-is missing
written by luwemba musa, July 10, 2010
We cannot say that the opposition is not relevant because its the government in waiting but our opposition stil needs to realise that what has made oppositions and coalitions to succed in the other countries is quite different given the difference in time and space,so unless we realise and appreciate the difference in time and space and that its not automatic because other factors are not constant,there is no way forward.the best word to use is "probnostication"-where the opposition wants to go and how to get there.Its what is still missing.
Spot on
written by Jasper, July 10, 2010
This is good because as Andrew argues, if Im afraid who am I likely to vote for ? Where change has taken place it was a result that the country will be stable. A good gospel to live and preach i must say.
WHY OPPOSITION NEEDS OPTISM.
written by CANDI JUSTINE, July 11, 2010
I strongly agreed with Mr. Andrew that if you believe in your self, you can archive anything.

The NRM government is eroding day and night in their attempt to cling on to power because,

What brought them to power was the politics of divide and rule which was the correct answer for
Uganda's problems in late 70s and early 80s.However,today with the Economic.political,socialand religious transformations begins taking shapes, the answers of those days can never apply in solving Uganda's problems today.We need Transparancy and justice for all ,which requires different and new approach.

The oppositions Should therefore build trust among theselves before they expect win over the NRM.

Self confidence or self delusion?
written by Emperror, July 11, 2010
Mwenda, the more I read your articles the more I realise how shallow you are, and what a fraud your "gospel" truly is. I do not spare myself for having fallen for your tripe (diatripe ?!) in the past.
That the opposition lacks CONCEPTUALLY sound ideolgy (ies), renders your call for "self-confidence" all but a moot point; I will not go into the optimism bit since your card pack "collapses" at the first (former) hurdle. The Mandelas and Luther Kings had a conceptually (if not morally / legal) basis for their stances, but more importantly, their case was put foward in a coherent (read eloquent) manner.
Mwenda, you are such a dissappointment, period.
Consultant
written by Joe, July 16, 2010
Mwenda, There no words to describe the opposition here.. One time I saw of an old man with very sick wounds with flies all over. Someone passed by and gave him a hanky to cover it up at least from the sea of flies around him. Alas, he threw the hanky away. The opposition in Uganda seems to be like the old man closed to hope and open to despair. i don't know they read Obama the success to the Top amidst challenges: Someone should try giving tits to them for those who can read and apply correctly. But as one Prof once put it If opposition wins i will eat my shoe.

Write comment

busy
 
 
 

Podcasts

Videos

You need Flash player 6+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.




RECOMMENDED

Society
Eco-art gets its prize On 17th April 2012, in Doha, Qatar, Ugandan Bruno Ruganzu stepped on the podium to claim the TED Prize for City 2.0 at the TEDx Summit. Ruganzu scooped US$10,000 prize, beating 700 competitors, includ...
 

MOST READ

LATEST COMMENTS

Kebab Says:
2012-05-11 08:23:36
what time does this air on capital fm? thanks ndereya

Garey Cole Says:
2012-05-11 13:49:16
THE YOU NEED A SUGAR MOMMY/DADDY PLEASE CONTACT US ON THIS EMAIL;gareycole@yahoo.com OR CALL THIS NUMBER FOR MORE INFO YOU NEED +2348131635534.

 
Joomla Templates and Joomla Extensions by JoomlaVision.Com
Mostly Cloudy

23°C

Mostly Cloudy

Humidity: 78%

Wind: SE at 7 mph

POLL

Was Amama Mbabazi serious about giving up half his salary to pay teachers?
 

ON THE SHELVES
Banner
 

Cover: FDC in crisis - Money, NRM intrusion and jostling for Besigye's chair rock the main opposition party.

Interview: I've no ambition of succeeding Besigye - Anywar.

News Analysis: Compromise rescues Public Order Bill.


Name:

Email:

COMMENT
Keyboard cops Excessive surveillance infringes on the privacy rights of individuals contrary to constitutional provisions Almost ...
 
 

 
 
Copyright © 2012 The Independent: You get the truth We Pay the Price. All Rights Reserved.