Last week’s issue of The Independent, with the cover story “Family rule in Uganda: How Museveni’s ‘clan’ runs government”, has turned out to be one of the post popular newspaper or magazine stories of the year so far, selling out across the country and requiring an additional print run of up to 7,000 copies. Even in what are supposedly President Yoweri Museveni strongholds such as Ankole and Toro in western Uganda, the magazine sold out, reflecting both an interest in and a resentment of the forces that make decisions in their country.
Before this, the appointment of the First Lady and MP for Ruhama, Janet Museveni, as minister in charge of Karamoja affairs, set off interest well beyond Uganda’s borders and in Kenya and Tanzania.
An article published in the Sunday Monitor on August 30, 2006 by the then Daily Monitor Political Editor Andrew Mwenda titled “Is the First Family fleecing Uganda?” provoked an angry and emotional outburst from President Museveni’s son-in-law Odrek Mugisha Rwabwogo.
This image is starting to become permanent that Uganda has now been turned into a one-man, one-family rule, something extremely sensitive to the Ugandan First Family.
The defensiveness and sensitivity to the way they are viewed by the public was first captured in this December 8, 2005 lead story by the Weekly Observer that reported on the upheaval within the Museveni family when Mrs. Museveni announced that she would seek a parliamentary seat in the 2006 general election.
The story summed up the tensions within the Museveni family over the First Lady’s growing political role and ambitions, the implicitly admitted fact that she is a real political force in the country, and the difficult maneouvres that President Museveni must undertake to keep his family and party united while at the same time quenching Janet Museveni’s quest for a more visible public role, and all the while trying to deflect the growing national resentment at the privileges the First Family enjoys while Ugandans go without the most basic of medical care and public utilities.
One of the key weaknesses in last week’s cover story in The Independent was its attempt to understand Museveni politically rather than personally.
A number of analysts and commentators like Dr Joe Oloka Onyango, Jaberi Bidandi Ssali, and Charles Onyango-Obbo, asked for their views as part of the reporting for last week’s cover story, offered a systemic, structural set of circumstances and influences to explain why Museveni has turned Uganda into a personal fiefdom. Thus they missed out on the obvious, personal story behind Museveni’s retreat to an essentially 18th century feudal governing style.
There is a side to Museveni’s personality and mannerisms that, even if he were the head of state of France or Italy, he would rule in a peculiar, somewhat primitive style. It is unique to him irrespective of Uganda’s wider politics or African cultural dynamics.
Yoweri Museveni has not become like this because of overstaying in power. He was this way all along, even as a student at Mbarara High School and Ntare School in the 1960s.
While appearing to be a leftist, Marxist student radical, both his deep resentment for and admiration of the Ankole royal family were the real motivation at work in his young mind. One only need read the classic novel Wuthering Heights by the 19th century English novelist Emily Brontë to understand the tormented soul of the Museveni-like character Heathcliff and his resentment toward the genteel and privileged Earnshaw family that adopts and raises him, to grasp where Museveni is coming from in relation to such prominent Ankole families as the royal family as well as the prominent Katanywa and the Byanyima families of Ankole, as well as Museveni’s fascination with the current Toro royal family.
After the fall of Mbarara and Fort Portal during the 1979 Uganda-Tanzania war Museveni, who was the Supreme Commissar of the FRONASA fighting force, made a point of taking up temporary residence in the palaces of the former kings of Ankole and Toro. And so, Museveni embraced the Marxist cause, not because he believed in egalitarian society, but because he resented his lowly origins and in the privileged royal families of western Uganda he saw what he craved to be but could not.
Then there is a specific factor behind this family rule that is a recent development. One of the reasons that Museveni in the last two years has retreated into an ever narrower circle of personal rule is because of a serious crisis within his household. It is widely known, or at least rumoured, that there are two women who wield considerable influence on Museveni; the First Lady Janet Museveni and his Principal Private Secretary Amelia Kyambadde.
A power rivalry between these two women has led to a major shake-up within the staff at State House, with each of these two women trying to appoint to positions of influence personnel loyal to them, according to several sources familiar with the workings at State House. Thus, there has been a real fear that amid this heightened intrigue at State House, Museveni could well be poisoned. This is the reason, among others, that his daughter Natasha Museveni Karugire was appointed to be in-charge of the household affairs and day-to-day management of the president’s official and private residential quarters.
Then too, following the death under still suspicious circumstances of the late permanent secretary of Defence and a long-time Museveni protégée, Brig. Noble Mayombo in May 2007, there has been heightened security at State House.
The events of last week in the West African nation of Guinea-Bissau in which the army chief of staff was killed by a bomb, only for soldiers to assassinate President Joao Benardo Vieira the next day, bears out the fear that has gripped State House since Mayombo’s death. This is a time of great personal insecurity among the First Family, who find themselves in an unhappy position – trapped by power, controlling as well as being controlled by it.
The more the resentment at Museveni’s rule grows, the more he must dig in and centre power within his family as his only political base and place of personal safety.
But the more he does this, the deeper the resentment at him and his family grows, leading to a spiraling cycle of paranoia and with the result that the normal functioning of the Uganda government is grinding to a halt.

written by Pyerarama Stewart, March 18, 2009
The Bible says ,Even if you pound a fool in a mortar,you will never remove his folly from him.
And thats why Africans die like flies because they don't have the wisdom to judge what is right and wrong,call it ignorance or stupidity.
written by Emperror, March 18, 2009
written by babiha, March 19, 2009
written by house, March 19, 2009
written by futsi, March 19, 2009
Their house will soon start to cramble on them Kampala buildings style,what rises falls...!
written by Steely, March 20, 2009
written by Moses Kakarugahi Nuwagaba, March 20, 2009
written by lutkot, March 20, 2009
written by David Kakande, March 20, 2009
When Augustus died in CE 14 -- just before he was seventy-seven -- Tiberius, at the age of 56, took the title of emperor, and he also became a consul. Like many dynastic successions to supreme power, Tiberius' succession was accompanied by murder. The victim was Agrippa Postumus, Julia's son by her previous marriage to Augustus' commander and companion, Agrippa. Augustus had adopted him as his son and had made him co-heir with Tiberius, but the boy seemed unruly and slow in thought, and Augustus disinherited him. After the death of Augustus, the boy, as a person of royal blood, was thought a possible rallying point for disaffected persons, and he was eliminated quickly and quietly.
Tiberius was bright, and he had a long history of service to Rome, including ably leading troops in Rome's frontier skirmishes. As emperor he was a capable administrator and had genuine concern for the empire's well-being. He let the Senate know that it was he who ruled, but he left some duties to the Senate, saving himself from being overburdened with work. He told the Senate to stop bothering him about every question that came up and to take initiative, but, to his disgust, senators cringed before him.
The Senate began responding to crises that routinely appeared -- one of which was the collapse of the poorly constructed amphitheater at Fidenae, which killed thousands. Regulating private businesses was recognized as in society's interest, and the Senate took action against frauds of various contractors, including the slackness of authorities that resulted in some roads becoming impassible.
The Senate was concerned about what it saw as a new freedom among women, about extravagant living and the rise in prices of food on the black market. But Tiberius saw all this as a part of the times, and he believed it was difficult to move people into the past, at least without making them unhappy and creating new opponents to his rule. But he did suggest to the Senate that it expel from Rome dancers who had come to Rome to put on obscene shows
written by Prince, March 20, 2009
We love this kind of reporting. The truth and nothing but the truth.
written by Paul Flight, March 20, 2009
People took every thing for granted, had ugandas given Dr kayiira enough support our beloved country would be in a better place now.
Thats the very reason why he was eliminate as soon as possible.
Words alone cannot change museveni so ugandas need to use the language he understands.
written by ronnie, March 21, 2009
He takes so long to bring his key point, & wehn he puts it forward doesnt really elaborate to make a valid arguement that this shd have been the point in Mwenda's previous analysis. It degenerates to many articles that you see in local publications that feed the urge for gossip by many & i think crucially fails to structure a credible arguement.
Theres though a good insight in the basis of M7's ideology.
written by pato, March 21, 2009
written by Edward Sansa, March 22, 2009
written by Ray Chrichton Mwene Turahaigur, March 23, 2009
Andrew i think these people are targeting the Karamoja reconstruction funds among other juicy opennings in this country. However they should Know that "ebyensi no'mushenyi" ( Things of this world are like sand) they will leave them and we shall enjoy.
Please let them know that they will colapse like Kla buildings and perish like Americans in Iraq
written by Mukalazi, March 24, 2009
Now here is this ''intellectual'' also committing the same mistakes like the swines. Where is the intellect of our revolutionary? Perharps Tamale Mirundi can help us here? KITALO
written by Katenta, March 24, 2009
written by Ocan Lit, July 29, 2009


















Manya If God gives you a way you use it accordilngly. Ofcourse Mr. President is very right to work with his own people. Thats the bayombo,beinerukari and abasita.
Even the late Obote used his own tribesmen like Oyite ojok,Smith Opon Acak and Aken Adok.
Long live Omusita. Mukama akuhe emigisha.
Mwijukuru wa abayombo na beine rukari. Owanyu buzima.