Venezuela’s volatile President Hugo Chavez liked to call former US president George W. Bush the Diablo, Spanish for “the devil”, but at last month’s Summit of the Americas, one of Latin America’s most radical leaders had a book instead of an insult to hand current US President Barack Obama.
Obama received a firm handshake and a paperback version of historian Eduardo Galeano’s 1971 book, “The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent”, complete with an inscription from Chavez: “To Obama, with affection.” And Galeano certainly owes a thank you to Chavez – sales of the book have skyrocketed in the past few weeks, jumping from 54,295th to number two on the site of online bookseller Amazon just days after the summit, according to the BBC.
No policy changes have yet resulted from this brief and highly publicised encounter, though it has attracted plenty of attention, both positive and negative. Also turning heads are Obama’s other recent interactions with governments and regimes hitherto considered “enemies” to the US, including Cuba and Iran.
In Cuba, the Obama administration is taking cautious steps toward ending the standoff between the two countries that began shortly after Fidel Castro’s revolution 50 years ago. Last month, on April 13, 2009, Obama administration Press Secretary Robert Gibbs announced, “the President has directed the Secretaries of State, Treasury and Commerce to carry out the actions necessary to lift all restrictions on the ability of individuals to visit family members in Cuba, and to send them remittances.” While the complete removal of the long-standing US embargo on the country is not yet on the table, many observers see these actions as a positive step forward for US-Cuban relations.
President Obama has also commissioned a re-examination of policy on Iran, another longtime adversary of the US.
The offering of these olive branches, cautious and conditional as they may be, mark a decisive about-face from Bush foreign policy, which seemed allergic to compromise and which divided the world into good and evil – those “with us”, and those “against us”. During his presidential campaign, Obama had promised a “new era of American leadership”, and he is now hopping from continent to continent making good on this promise. The administration asserts that this new leadership involves “tough and direct diplomacy without preconditions with all nations, friend and foe,” starting in some of the trickiest corners of the world.
But will Obama’s approach work? As of now, it is unclear what the specific outcomes of Obama’s actions will be. In Cuba, for example, while leader Raul Castro said is he open for talks with the US, he would likely have to demonstrate considerable progress on improving the Cuba’s record on human rights and democratic governance before Obama administration and US Congress would even consider lifting the 47-year old economic embargo.
In Iran, progress on the diplomatic front looks even more challenging. Following Obama’s overtures to the Iranian regime, though Ahmadinejad suggested there would be a “new offer” regarding the nuclear program, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei took a harder stance.
Meanwhile, Obama has taken a pounding from critics at home who feel his diplomatic strategy is too soft for dealing with battle-hardened dictators and autocratic regimes.
But what such critics seem to miss is the power of perception, namely the perception of the US by the rest of the world. Those who hated Bush and his bulldozing diplomatic tendencies see Obama as a breath of fresh air, as a new starting point, as a potential partner rather than an imperialistic bully. The failures of Bush’s War on Terror, and the economic shambles in which he left his country and the world made many lose faith in the legitimacy of the United States as the world’s superpower. It is this legitimacy that Obama is slowly rebuilding, one olive branch at a time.
Despite its financial woes, USA is still the economic superpower of the world, and will be for the foreseeable future, trillion dollar deficits notwithstanding. The US has the largest economy in the world, accounting for around one quarter of the world’s GDP. Its economy is three times the size of Japan’s, the world’s second largest economy (China falls close behind). And despite the tarnished image of the US that Bush left behind, it is already clear that Obama is restoring and polishing America’s political legitimacy. Across the globe, Bush critics, skeptics, and enemies alike (not to mention allies) seem generally willing to give Obama a chance to redeem the stumbling superpower, or at least willing to accept the President’s diplomatic massaging – what some have even termed “geotherapy”.
Nevertheless, there remain problematic regimes like that of Kim Jong-Il in North Korea, for whom an extended olive branch may be taken only to be turned around and used to poke Obama in the eye. Meanwhile, the US is being kept busy trying to extinguish the fires that have popped up around the world –piracy off the coast of Somalia, drug wars in Mexico, not to mention Iraq and Afghanistan.

written by postor1, May 06, 2009
Yes! Open up travel to Cuba - More US dollars for Castro's regime. Maybe if we're lucky we'll be able to travel to North Korea sometime soon, too.
You cannot appease nor negotiate with EVIL! When will those on the left figure that out? Probably never. The only ones who will benefit from these actions are the Castros.
100,000 cubans murdered....more than 300,000 have suffered prison...almost one third of population in exile...and thousands drowning in the ocean every year escaping from hell....and some people have the audacity to call for “normalization of relations” . Poor souls! How can they look themselves in the mirror every morning.
I remember well during the "apartheid" years in South Africa, how all these anti-embago voices (for Cuba) demanded from the United States a total economic blockade, called "disengagement", against the government of that country. What a hypocritical double standard ! Now they happily advocate for total "engagement" with a 50 years old totalitarian regime. They don't even care that more than 50 per cent of the oppressed people in Cuba are black.
From his grave, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. answers those who want to negociate with the Castro regime.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968 and cannot comment directly on this article or to those who would go to Cuba to lick the bloodied boots of a dictator that has enslaved 11 million Cubans for 50 years.
But we can quote the leader of the American Civil Rights movement to show what he would have told those who today proclaim to follow his principles, while doing completely the opposite of what he preached.
Here is a famous quote by Dr. King, that applies perfectly to those who want to go to Cuba to support an evil dictator:
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it. ... So in order to be true to one's conscience and true to God, a righteous man has no alternative but to refuse to cooperate with an evil system." From Dr King's book "Stride Toward Freedom," Page 51.
For some insensitive people, the Castro brothers are more important than the stifled freedom voices languishing in Castros' jails…..but most American citizens do not dismiss history as lightly as you seem to do. Intelligent people are not fooled by your rantings. America has always stood alone when it comes to moral issues. The fact that the rest of the world recognizes Cuba and its regime has absolutely NO bearing on America's stance
written by postor1, May 06, 2009
written by postor1, May 06, 2009
For some insensitive people, the Castro brothers are more important than the stifled freedom voices languishing in Castros' jails…..but most American citizens do not dismiss history as lightly as you seem to do. Intelligent people are not fooled by your rantings. America has always stood alone when it comes to moral issues. The fact that the rest of the world recognizes Cuba and its regime has absolutely NO bearing on America's stance.
written by postor1, May 06, 2009
I urge everyone to look at the speech by Senator Menendez D-NJ on youtube (a link posted here). He details the truth about life in Cuba, and the abuses of the Castro dictatorship. It should be required watching for those which have apparently abandoned their moral duty to freedom. Shame! pro-Castro elements for participating in such a sham, and for espousing admiration for the Castro brothers and their totalitarian regime. I expect such excesses from radicals, but not from anyone who thinks clearly, or from anyone who values freedom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vbpJ6Ishbg
written by rwabukanga, May 12, 2009

















Fidel Castro decided since 1959 to confiscate American properties . He executed and jailed Americans and didn't want us there. During the October Missile Crisis of 1962, Castro wrote a personal letter to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushev, begging him to "nuke" the United States. Castro supported all anti-American efforts in Latin America: Tupamaros, Montoneros, FMLN guerrillas; and now is the political adviser of Hugo Chavez and other anti- American crusaders. This paranoic dictator wants the U.S. taxpayers to finance his failed oppressive regime.
It is estimated that the Castro brothers will pocket 5 billion dollars, if American tourists are allowed to go there for a good brainwash. Many will go to enjoy cuban cigars, rum and to engage in the horrors of child prostitution (jineteras) promoted by the authorities. Others in the extreme left, will go to reaffirm their ideological convictions and to bring back home fresh anti- American slogans from "el Comandante". After 50 years of communism, Cubans see the United States as the "promised land" and the "American Way of Life " as the raw model for their future generations. This mistaken policy will destroy forever our present moral image and stature in the eyes of the oppressed people in Cuba. They need freedom.....but have no use for abusive adventurers, communist fellow travelers or Castro siypathizers. I think it would be wise if all this money destined for Castro, stay home to help aliviate our awful economic situation.