Monday 21st of May 2012 11:14:55 PM
 
 
 
Home Features Features What is Uganda: A crisis of national identity?

What is Uganda: A crisis of national identity?

E-mail Print PDF

At the age of 27, I have been to every continent except Antarctica, visited over 30 countries and lived in five. Extensive travel as a tourist has given me a broad overview of the cultural diversity Planet Earth offers. I have learned what makes a country memorable, seen what brings a country's nationals together and experienced a wide range of cultures.

Travel, for me, is not about beaches and entertainment so much as a search for culture and an opportunity to meet people. As a result, quite naturally, part of my first African experience living here in Uganda was to ask the Ugandans I met ,what is Uganda? By that, I meant: what is your identity? What makes your country unique? Before I came, like most foreigners, the only things I associated with Uganda were war and Idi Amin. However, that was a long time ago and I soon realised I was doing this beautiful country an injustice, so I was determined to find out more.

Bafflingly, Ugandans themselves have not been very helpful in answering the question and I guess that is my first clue. I ask and there is silence, hesitation and then, invariably, a smile, followed by the answer: the Pearl of Africa! This is like saying that France equals the Eiffel Tower or the sun is hot. After the few months I have spent in Uganda, I think the title is certainly justified but it does not tell me much.

Clearly, there is a lot more to say about a country with so much potential. A recent article, internationally published, stated that Uganda had the biggest young population in Africa, which is pretty much the same as saying in the world. That makes this country's future. The question is, what future can its youth have if they do not know who they are? How do you build and represent a country you cannot describe and a nation of which you have no ownership?

I worked with an education NGO here and spent some time with senior classes, Five and Six, those students who are about to head out into the big world. As routine, we asked them to introduce themselves and, invariably, the first concept they used to qualify themselves was their clan. There seems to be real shame for those who cannot identify with a specific clan and I have yet to hear anyone start with a proud "I am a Ugandan!"

Don't get me wrong, cultural diversity is a beautiful thing: traditions, languages and so on should be preserved and kept alive. But what defines Uganda in the absence of a strong cultural identity and a national sense of unity? A collection of borders, memories of old rivalries, and badly-healed battle scars.

With what many are calling a decisive election up ahead, it's time to also think about those young people's legacy. The tide is slowly turning in the education system as the realisation dawns that you cannot fit students into a mould that does not prepare them for the realities of today's job market. As adjustments are made to teach them leadership, entrepreneurship and self-reliance, the curriculum should also encourage them to answer the question "what is Uganda?"

They should learn what their country is and what makes them Ugandan. Since the campaigning has started, I have heard calls for less corruption and more accountability; I have heard comparisons with neighbouring countries and criticisms of those in power, but no calls for cohesion, no constructive suggestions for a positive way forward. I hear a lot of noise but no voices.

Why does Uganda need a national identity? you may ask. Why the need for sustainable solutions when each day seems the same as the previous one? what does Uganda want for its future?

I recently attended a dinner for the Ugandan Global Leadership Summit and the topic was Uganda's future and, more specifically, the country's development. The guest speaker made a great presentation on countries like Korea and Malaysia that have built themselves up to become industrial forces and suggested Uganda learns from that. This brought to mind a picture of an industrialised nation full of factories and the death of the Pearl of Africa. There is a dangerous tendency to go for the obvious and take the path of least resistance, often with irreversibly disastrous consequences.

If, instead, you build up the national cultural identity, you get a strong proud nation that relies on more than badly manufactured cheap goods to run its economy. Just look at the French, they are a world force mainly because of their headstrong cultural identity and Gallic "I don't take no for an answer" attitude.

Developing a Ugandan individuality will also clarify the country's economic potential. The starting point should be "what do we have?" and not "what are others doing?" or "what do others have that we can copy?" From what I have seen, Uganda has a lot to offer but this has, mostly, been overlooked or badly marketed, often by foreigners who have no interest in building up the country's identity. A cultural distinctiveness is essential to develop a strong tourism market. In so many places I have visited, despite the rich Ugandan heritage, the crafts on sale come from everywhere but Uganda.

I heard of the main attractions in Uganda by word of mouth, only once I got here, and internet searches for further information have proved unfruitful. There are quite a few undiscovered gems that could really put the Pearl of Africa on the map!

Do I have all the answers? No. Have I really been here long enough to acquire the confidence I display in this article? Debatable. However, I know that I have yet to meet a Ugandan who can answer the question"what is Uganda?" and help me understand this country, which I am learning to call home. My upbringing in nations with strong cultural identities and my extensive travels have shown me the importance of cultural identity to the development of a nation.

The pieces of the puzzle are there: the National Contemporary Ballet performs every month; cultural troops dance, sing and play music at functions and events; Ugandan artists are making unique Ugandan products using materials like bark cloth; new cultural centres are being built and the environment features breathtaking landscapes, natural wonders, and spectacular wildlife. Uganda has so much going for it. The trick is now to package it, for its own people and for the world.

Socially, economically and even politically, countrywide unity and pride will enable Uganda to build a strong future for its young people. It will give the future generations pride and a sense of belonging to a cohesive nation. Building and consolidating the strong foundation that is already there can only make the construction more secure. I see the potential - I see the benefits: do you?

Comments (28)Add Comment
Empty prose
written by Kasolo, December 01, 2010
There is a problem when transplanted people write about societies in which they seek endearment, but do not have the means to be accepted.
Common to such groups, the above writer thinly veils a sn****rring attitude. He/she has assigned what they fit in their mind, in contrast to reality. I will assume that the writer is female and will not bother to ask her what Poland or the Czec republic mean to her. She sees a problem with people identifying themselves by their clans when she asks, but then hastens to label us as a people without a unifying culture or identity! Someone should inform this intern that when a society is in socio-political dire straights like Uganda is, culture is a refuge for those who see little hope and this preserves the generation.
Empty prose
written by Kasolo, December 01, 2010
Furthermore, branding a country is certainly not a requisite for development or identity. Sloganeering is for campaigns and not practical issues! Her article should be forwarded to her lecturer for marking but not for our consumption. We sure have characteristics that define us and make us proud. We do not have to recite them to an outsider whose head is laden with stereotypes.
Ugana.
written by obee, December 01, 2010
Uganda is president Yoweri Kaguta Museveni
Dangerous view
written by Mugulusi, December 01, 2010
The kind of thinking expressed in this article is very dangerous to the progress of our country. Clearly, the author has a romatic view of current Uganda, the pearl of Africa, that should be preserved by not encouring industrial development! In the view of this author the country should focus on developing cultural artifacts (bark cloth products, cultural troop dances, etc) instead of building factories that will only produce "badly manufactured cheap goods!" American, Japanese, Chinese and even European industries in their infancy churned out "badly manugactured cheap goods." Uganda and Africa need to develop an industrial base and shouldn't be deterred because they won't instantly produce quality products on per with those manufactured in advanced countries.
Dangerous view
written by Mugulusi, December 01, 2010
The question the author possess is quite problematic and it doesn't easily translate into the question she/he actually wants to ask. "What is Uganda?" "What is your identity?" What is a Ugandan? What makes you Ugandan? What is the Uganda identity? What distinguishes a Ugandan from a Kenyan or other nationalities? What distinguishes Uganda from Kenya or other countries? I believe the question "what is Uganda?" is radically different from the question "what is your identity?" A person can give varying answers to the former e.g. geographical coordinates, historical facts of the country and its people, demographics, cultural composition etc.
Dangerous view
written by Mugulusi, December 01, 2010
What is your identity...that is a tough question, do you want individual identity, societal/cultural identity, national identity? Do answers to the question "what is your identity?" have to correspond with answers to "what is your national identity?" I don't think so.
The author wants to understand Uganda's national identity but she is asking the wrong questions and getting all the right answers yet they appear unsatisfactory.
Dangerous view
written by Mugulusi, December 01, 2010
Uganda is as a young nation needs to create a mythical national identity that our politicians and 'patriots' will keep singing to the satisfaction of people like this author and at times put is serivice of national cohesion and mobilization. I am thinking along the lines of the Americans (U.S) that they are exceptional and the country was founded on principles of freedom and equality!
Hold On!
written by Baaba, December 01, 2010
There is a line in the middle to both sides of this discussion. I believe the questions posed by the writer (don't know why the assumption is female!!), if asked of a country like Rwanda, answers would be different or at least forthcoming. I do not recognise the Uganda of today compared to when she was actually penned the "Pearl of Africa" name. There is the glaring absence of development geared towards the progress of Uganda - as opposed to the individuals who gain. If that's the starting point, I think one realises that there is a need for such a national development agenda to be promoted. Manufacturing is welcome but not an end all. I certainly see where the questions are coming from.....
Uganda is a geographical expression
written by Maceni Mugoma, December 01, 2010
Uganda is a geographical expression created by the british empire. An administrative unit of the colonial gov’t used to organize the societies within it to for effective subjugation. This this the starting point of the creation of Uganda—How does anyone create an identity from this--- How do we rally around the machinery that was used to oppress us .
an instrument to access the global system
written by Maceni Mugoma, December 01, 2010
Uganda as it is right now is simply an instrument through which its citizens can access the global system (for trade, travel etc) - beyond that its actually quite useless to its residents .The state does not provide adequate health, education etc—all those things associated with the social contract – to elicit loyalty and consequently nationalism. It was not created by people who reside in its territory nor with the welfare of its residents in mind. True nationalism actually has more to do with diminishing the significance of the Ugandan state (effectively kill the colonial state) – by rallying around the EAC the AU or any other entities who creation will be borne out of deliberations that are of our own doing.
...
written by Maceni Mugoma, December 01, 2010
I don’t think the writer understands the extent to which legacy of subjugation defines the current state—I don’t think they have even gotten their arms around the idea – that only a generation ago we were subjects of the state and not citizens. This a case of just needing to studying African History 101.
African societies in the past have found ways to create cohesion without necessarily pursuing uniformity – The idea that bonds of society can only be expressed through creating some sort of uniformity of language culture etc is a construct of 19th century European nationalism…and may be very deficient in trying to explain or cultivate what it means to be a Ugandan.
WHICH NATION DO YOU KNOW CAN DEFINE ITSELF
written by Kibuuka Omumbale, December 01, 2010
Ella you would have done well to write about what your own country is. Strangely like me you have a name that does not suit your citizenship. Me being British yet my name is Kasolo. So give one country that has its people and the people would be able to tell you what their country is. E.G. USA or GB or Rusia. No country has a definition of itself. But when pen is moved by uncontrollable hands and a misguided brain we have the Ellas of this world. History will also tell you that Uganda is the making of people like Churchill so it is right that his coinage is used to define it; Pearl of Africa, where independent nations were brought into a united federation to be Uganda
Understand Culture
written by malepale, December 02, 2010
The author completely misses the point about people defining their identity by clan to mean that they dont identify themselves as Ugandan. I have a name which automatically identifies my clan. This clan is the building block to my ethnicity and finally my nationality as a Ugandan. This relationship cannot be inverted except if one becomes Ugandan by "adoption", which is also acceptable in our laws. I am therefore proud of my clan my ethinicity and my nationality, without one necessarily de-meaning the other. Does someone identifying themselves as Scottish or Welsh(as they often do) mean they are not proud of their identity as British citizens? C'mon puleez!
Response to comments
written by Ella Rychlewski, December 02, 2010
First of all, thank you for your comments. I must say I had hoped for some debate on this topic but I am a little sad to see that it is centered mainly on who I am and where I come from. The article I wrote was centered on a question and I would like to respond to a few comments:
-Building a strong tourism industry and a strong cultural identity is not romantic; I would cite the often forgotten example of New-Zealand, which has a good economy and development rate while still being based on tourism and agriculture. So I merely meant to suggest that there is more than one way forward and that Uganda has the resources to make its own

Response to comments
written by Ella Rychlewski, December 02, 2010
-Today I was reading a report on the Transition to Peace in Northern Uganda and one of the top requests for government from the people in the Acholi region was to ‘unite the people of Uganda’ so this is a question raised by some Ugandans themselves
-A comment points out that there is a difference between personal identity and cultural identity and several point out that you can belong to a clan and still be Ugandan… all of this is true and none of it is mutually-exclusive (I never said any of it was!), but I would like to know what unites because what divides is obvious
...
written by Ella Rychlewski, December 02, 2010
-Several mention that Uganda is a product of colonialism, no argument from me, and we all know how negative the results of that have been. But will you let it define you? Are you ok with the fact that abroad Uganda is defined by Idi Amin and the LRA? If Uganda is not what you want to be...then what?
A Forcible Amalgam of nations
written by Kasaija Rwakaikara, December 02, 2010
Sadly we like many nations are defined by history and current issues. Uganda is an amalgam of nations which were forcibly brought under one roof. Until those nations are accorded the freedom to recognise themselves and respect each other, you can not form a Uganda with a common identity. People instead will continue to identigy with what you think divides them. Ask a Muganda what Buganda is, a Munyoro what Bunyoro is, A Lango what Lango is and you will the speed, fluency and clarity. Unitl Uganda recognises the fact that is a group of nations, it will never be able to define itself. It will remain the land of Amin, LRA, expelled Asians, etc.
Forcible Amalgam continued
written by Kasaija Rwakaikara, December 02, 2010
If you went to Europe and forced all European counties into one country and then asked citizens of that country what Europe is, they would stammer the way we Ugandans do about Uganda. We must recognise the nations that make this entity called Uganda and then we can identify Uganda. In otherwords let us recognise, accept and even celebrate our diversity, and only then shall we get preoccupied with the search for a common identity. Many Ugandans think the colonial way - that you can build uganda by killing the constituent nations and on their graves, build a thriving country!.
...
written by Maceni Mugoma, December 02, 2010
Ella your article has good intentions but exposes your lack of knowledge about Uganda-- which is fine -- You are a tourist-- you dont need to draw from anything else but what you observe. The problem comes when you try to offer explanations- honestly you just dont understand some underlying complexities and all the historical, political and economic facts that shape them.
...
written by Maceni Mugoma, December 02, 2010
Secondly the fact that we even call ourselves Ugandan-- already makes us defined by colonialism. There have several attempts to re-define the state to make it a viable political and economic unit - like the EAC intergration, move to federalism etc ...Only a viable unit can cultivate nationalism , culture and everything else you associate with country's. Until that happens we are still governed by largely colonial state structures-- the elites who benefit from these tyranical systems will not allow for them to be redefined.
PhD
written by Malcom, December 07, 2010
social identity, Race, profession etc. so in that case that question is too broad, too abstruct and extreamly missleading.
The Scottish Mukiga
written by JB, December 07, 2010
Ella's article does raise a platform for debate - I don't think her intention was ever to masquerade as an expert on the complexities re: 'the politics of being Ugandan'. Ella, my view is that you would get the more straightforward "I'm a proud Ugandan" response if you asked the question at a Ugandan pub in croydon, south london. Typically, Ugandans living in Uganda identify more with their tribes and are proud of their respective tribe's culture. Dig deeper and you will discover some interesting, varying identities.
Nationalism Vs Continentalism
written by Bisrat, December 07, 2010
I am an Ethiopian who has been in many African countries. I was also in Uganda in one of the boarding school to do my A-level certificate. The sense of the Ugandans national identity is not peculiar from the majority of African countries. Yes, I was also deceived for some time that Ugandans lack national identity, but that was not the case. I think the problem exist in the way we are asking those question and have expectations of specific answers to determine identity. During my stay in Uganda I came to realize that Ugandans have one the strongest African and Black people identity than anywhere I traveled. I learned my true identity as an African from Ugandans and I am thankful and proud of it, after all at this time what we need to promote in Africa is African Continentalism.
CEO
written by Ambriose Kibuuka M, January 03, 2011
It's a pity that Ella's point seems to have been missed by most comentators. Hence, the rather defensive reaction. His article does not contradict any of the salient historical facts and observations the commentators are raising about Uganda. Yes that certainly is our historical reality. A multiplicity of nations pasted together by colonial act.
Ella Misunderstood: Killing the Messenger, Ignoring the message
written by Ambriose Kibuuka M, January 03, 2011
Till now most of them dont know well enough about each other. Today, the President castigates the "tribes" only to turn around the following day speaking in the language of his "tribe" proudly quoting the wisdom of its proverbs. Thats how confused we seem to be. And if i understand Ella well, his point is for how long do we want to go on with this confusion? What is the price we pay for the vagueness? Whatever colonialism did, we do well to remember that "you do not drown by falling in water, you drown by staying there".
Thought Provoking, on track.
written by Iwaya, February 03, 2011
How rare and refreshing to read an article in a Ugandan publication that not only addresses a vital question (which it seems has never been asked, except in political and economic terms) of what does it mean to be a Ugandan! Who is a Ugandan? Do you feel Ugandan? Culture, in Ugandan public debate, is often sneered at as something that should be left to cultural troupes and for tourists to come and see, completely unaware that before you can be something/someone, you must first know what/who you are. You can only do that when you know where you stand culturally.
...
written by Iwaya, February 03, 2011
This is where Elly's article brings to mainstream discussion this very important question of what does it mean to be a Ugandan? It is a debate we urgently need to have on all levels all over this land that was designated as Uganda if we are ever going to be able to feel Ugandan at all. Elly is entirely right in asking the question. I'm waiting for one person commenting to define "What it means to be a Ugandan. Who is a Ugandan?"
This is a Valid Question
written by Kaz Kasozi, February 03, 2011
I am an artist and I find that the article addresses elements that are pertinent to my work and several are matters many in my circles have debated for quite some time especially when we have to perform abroad where the notion of my "Ugandanness" easily overwhelms my other cultural identities such as clanship and tribe etc... I have looked through the responses and I find everyone rather defensive without truly addressing Ella's statements. Harking on about colonial constructs is so lazy because Uganda is here now and the question is what are we going to do with it as it stands. I think several of the commentators need to re-read the article with an objective lens and then debate the points rather than rubbishing the author.

Write comment

busy
 
 
 

Podcasts

Videos

You need Flash player 6+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.




RECOMMENDED

Society
Eco-art gets its prize On 17th April 2012, in Doha, Qatar, Ugandan Bruno Ruganzu stepped on the podium to claim the TED Prize for City 2.0 at the TEDx Summit. Ruganzu scooped US$10,000 prize, beating 700 competitors, includ...
 

MOST READ

LATEST COMMENTS

Kebab Says:
2012-05-11 08:23:36
what time does this air on capital fm? thanks ndereya

Garey Cole Says:
2012-05-11 13:49:16
THE YOU NEED A SUGAR MOMMY/DADDY PLEASE CONTACT US ON THIS EMAIL;gareycole@yahoo.com OR CALL THIS NUMBER FOR MORE INFO YOU NEED +2348131635534.

 
Joomla Templates and Joomla Extensions by JoomlaVision.Com
Partly Cloudy

22°C

Partly Cloudy

Humidity: 83%

Wind: E at 2 mph

POLL

Was Amama Mbabazi serious about giving up half his salary to pay teachers?
 

ON THE SHELVES
Banner
 

Cover: FDC in crisis - Money, NRM intrusion and jostling for Besigye's chair rock the main opposition party.

Interview: I've no ambition of succeeding Besigye - Anywar.

News Analysis: Compromise rescues Public Order Bill.


Name:

Email:

COMMENT
Keyboard cops Excessive surveillance infringes on the privacy rights of individuals contrary to constitutional provisions Almost ...
 
 

 
 
Copyright © 2012 The Independent: You get the truth We Pay the Price. All Rights Reserved.