Boldly, PAYE (Pay As You Earn) is 30% levy pried off from employees/workers' salaries monthly. While presenting budget proposals to the Parliamentary Committee on Trade, Tourism and Industry on April 22, 2010, the Uganda National Chamber of Commerce and Industry proposed that PAYE be scrapped-with immediacy. This is why?

For starters, just like graduated tax, hut tax, poll tax etc, PAYE is a mercantilist and colonial tax. It is a direct and non-consensual tax and for the case of Uganda, not commensurate to public good/priority services that taxpayers expect in return from government. This tax which contributes 16% to the national treasury is shouldered by a paltry 4% of the population (employees in formal sectors of the economy- government and private sector). This also means that 30 million people in Uganda are freewheelers. This tax has a negative bearing on productivity, economic growth and Growth Domestic Happiness on our country.

In my protracted conversations with professionals from around the world on this matter, the majority seem to flag a rather naïve narrative that there is no way any government can abandon this easy to collect and guaranteed revenue. That emerging economies like Uganda cannot survive without PAYE. I only recall Prof. Juluis Sen of London School of Economics who argued that my proposals would work in countries where tax management systems are fully developed. I partly agreed with him. I am also comforted by the fact that countries like Honduras and the State of Qatar scrapped PAYE long ago and are shining today. Even major economies where levies on personal incomes thrive, these taxes are tagged to social security- contributions to pension and provident funds. I have told the skeptical that you are wrong. Scrapping PAYE would do economic miracles for this country. Let's take an example of employee or worker X who earns a gross of Shs4m a month, and therefore pays 30% or Shs1.2m in PAYE to government every month.

Scenario A: If PAYE is scrapped and therefore employee X retains Shs1. 2m and we assume he spends the money on any sort of consumption. The foregoing means a rise in aggregate demand of the country. In simple terms, increased consumption of goods and services means that industries and factories will increase production, increase number of workers (job creation) and will pay more in cooperate taxes to government. This situation also means that employee X will pay more VAT to Uganda Revenue Authority (for every consumption on consumer and even capital goods and services, VAT is factored and born by the consumer). Most important of all, the consumer attains satisfaction and happiness. Since scrapping of PAYE means a bigger take home package, the employee is motivated and more productive at work station. This is good for the country.

Scenario B: Let's assume employee X invests the Shs1.2m in stocks, poultry or piggery project. The foregoing means that government will earn from issuing licence (KCC Licence if one operates in Kampala). Then X will create eight jobs and more at the business installation. There is a multiplier effect here that pushes more citizens in productive sectors of the economy and adjunct increment in the volume of trade in the country e.tc. If you look at this full circle, government would indirectly collect more revenue from the above scenario as opposed to withholding Shs1.2m from X's gross salary.

Scenario C: If employ X decides to save the 1.2m in any bank, he will consolidate savings and earn interest. He will quickly marshal capital finance to invest in small to Cadillac businesses, spread wealth and create employment. The bank will increase the loan portfolio pool and thus pay more loan withholding tax to government. More borrowers translate into revenue to government earned on credit facility and bankable projects of borrowers.

The foregoing scenarios demonstrate that by scrapping PAYE government will collect more revenue, increase productivity, create more jobs, spur economic growth and guarantee Gross Domestic Happiness. Instead of relying on inhibitive tax regimes like PAYE, the government should instead focus on widening the tax base using modernist and rational strategies that don't hurt aggregate demand and productivity. In a country where majority employees earn peanuts and shoulder extensive social and economic burdens, such a tax €"PAYE €" is not moral. To broaden the tax base, the government should not encourage selective tax exemptions and tax holidays for large firms. Government should also urgently create an incentive structure that increases formalisation of businesses in Uganda.

Reducing informality would expand the tax base and allow government increase resources for improving the investment climate and reduce the burden of taxation on the small formal enterprises on the country. To reduce informality, the government must reduce the costs of becoming formal and increase the benefits/incentives of becoming formal. For instance, firms that become formal increase chances of access to finance from the formal banking system, allow entrance to higher value supply chains with large formal firms for lucrative business. Formalisation means that small and medium enterprises and big firms will now have ability to seek refunds of their VAT expenditures. The Uganda National Chamber of Commerce and industry would leverage its countrywide business networks to deepen the business formalisation campaign.

ur proposal of expunging PAYE regime was stayed in Minister Bbumb's budget address to the nation. She however indicated that Income Tax Reforms are on the way. The Uganda National Chamber of Commerce and Industry will continue to place this proposal on the table. Let's continue this conversation.

Morrison Rwakakamba is the Secretary General

Uganda National Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UNCCI)

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Add Comment Preview